PDA

View Full Version : Just what should a 'complete chassis' consist of?


mr henderson
19th July 2009, 09:06 AM
As some of you may already know, I work on kit cars full time, mostly finishing off kits that the original builders have run out of time, or patience, with.

Typical situation would be where somebody has been building a car for a few years, progress has been slow, it's a bit trickier than thery expected, they are busy at work, etc etc, and they just need someone to finish off the kit and get it on the road.

Anyway, I frequently find myself stuck on a build because I am waiting for parts, or waiting for a decision from the owner, or waiting for various other reasons, so I decided to build a car of my own, for eventual sale, so as to have something to do when other work is held up for some reason.

Having decided on the Haynes Roadster, I then looked into getting a ready made chassis. I wasn't able to find anyone who could supply one at a reasonable price or within a reasonable length of time, so realised that I would have to make it myself.

I used to be involved in chassis making, so I have been busy digging out all my equipment and updating some of it so as to improved the accuracy and speed of the assembly. The main jig consists of two large, heavy steel girders with various other steel parts welded and clamped to them, I don't use a build table as such. I use lasers for projecting centrelines and checking some of the distances. The stuff I use for cutting and preparing the ends is easily capable of matching the accuracy of the ready made chassis packs available, and has the advantage that I can modify the design dimensions if necessary.

Having gone to all this trouble, and having become recently aware of the difficulty in obtaining a ready-made chassis, I am now wondering if I should offer ready-made chassis to others. In order to know how much to ask, though, I have to know just what I am going to be supplying, in other words, just what is a complete chassis?

Normally I would think of a complete chassis as being the central assembly to which everything which needs to be welded to it has already been welded to it. So, obviously, things such as seatbelt mountings would be an integral part.

But what about the rollbar? That's bolted on, as is the pedal box, although both these sub-assemblies require welding.

Sorry to go on at such length, and thanks for reading this far. I thought the background would prove useful. So, what I would like to know is-

Just what would the people here expect to be included in a complete chassis? Oh, and by the way, if anyone knows of somebody who is already selling a complete chassis (and which is available within a reasonable length of time) I would be very interested, and would simply buy one and cancel my own chassis-making plans and get on with my car building plans.

flyerncle
19th July 2009, 09:23 AM
3GE do one,and someone in clydeside is as well.
My idea of a complete chassis would have all the brackets fitted for suspension,steering,rad ,brake lines, roll bar inc and wishbones ready to bolt on.All you would have to do is fit hubs etc (available as a kit of course).

The idea of the Roadster is that " you " build it on a budget and the satisfaction I personally get from seeing a pile of metal growing all beit slowly into a car is indescribable. The day I can say to someone that ask's "Where did you buy it" will not come quickly enough and you know exactly what the answer will be.

There is a market for what you have in mind and something custom built to their spec is what some will be looking for.

Good luck.

slimtater
19th July 2009, 10:00 AM
Personally, as someone who hasn't got the space, talent or equipment needed to build the cahssis, I would have liked the idea of getting something like the attached image (bar engine etc).
I had planned to buy an MK Indy at a simlar stage when I found my Roadster by good fortune, so ended up paying for a finished car.
If someone offered to build one to this stage with the customer supplied wheels, uprights, brakes, shocks, then that would be a great service.
Hmmmm, I have the wheels, brakes, uprights etc waiting......

mr henderson
19th July 2009, 10:06 AM
3GE do one,and someone in clydeside is as well.


Unfortuntely 3GE have a waiting list of many months, otherwise I would probably have got one.

'Someone in Clydeside' is really a bit to vague to be of any real use to me, I'm afraid, but thanks anyway.

mr henderson
19th July 2009, 12:11 PM
Clydeautomarine are building chassis for the roadster and looking at another post on here so are Talon Motor Sport, as well as Armoto and 3GE, so you have a few to chose from.



As to Clydeautomarine, I'm guessing that they did have in mind to offer chassis but for some reason or other haven't seen it through
http://www.haynes.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?t=1662
certainly there has been no response to my request for pictures, and I have had PM's which suggest that there may be some kind of problem there

The Talon Motorsport thing really hasn't got going yet, as the guy himself says, he just doing market research at the moment.

3GE, as said earlier, have a very long waiting list, I was quoted nine months, so that's no good either

So that leaves us with Armoto. I was aware that they did ready cut chassis parts, but didn't know that they also offered ready made complete chassis. Are you sure? I would appreciate any information you have about that.

fabbyglass
19th July 2009, 12:19 PM
If anyone is going to do a chassis then it should be treated like any other kit and shouldn't need any extra brackets welding on...buy it take it home and start bolting it together like a big meccano kit.

There are quite a few cars out there now that wouldn't be there if it wasn't for Uncle Ron's book, they have evolved from escort based Locost to Sierra and BMW based whatevers...has to be the easiest route into being a kit car manufacturer:D

Bonzo
19th July 2009, 12:33 PM
My ten pence worth !!

I would class a complete chassis as one completed to the book spec or to the customers individual specs ( At extra cost ).

Requires no further welding. :) :)

Bolt on components. Roll bar, wishbones, painted or powder coated finish & the likes, all optional extras ;)

fabbyglass
19th July 2009, 12:36 PM
My ten pence worth !!

I would class a complete chassis as one completed to the book spec or to the customers individual specs ( At extra cost ).

Requires no further welding. :) :)

Bolt on components. Roll bar, wishbones, painted or powder coated finish & the likes, all optional extras ;)

Persactly...;)

RAYLEE29
19th July 2009, 01:49 PM
I would have to say that to me a complete chassis would be exactly that "complete" in other words ready to receive all the other components without use of a welder.
I dont want to teach granma to suck eggs, but would suggest you build a complete car first then build chassis to the same spec to sell as then you can be confident that nothing has been forgotten and all the bits fit.
Thats what i would do if i were to offer a chassis for sale as "complete"
Ray :)

fabbyglass
19th July 2009, 01:52 PM
I agree there meduck a car must be built first to iron out any issues then jig it all up and productionise it all.

HandyAndy
19th July 2009, 02:00 PM
I would have to say that to me a complete chassis would be exactly that "complete" in other words ready to receive all the other components without use of a welder.
I dont want to teach granma to suck eggs, but would suggest you build a complete car first then build chassis to the same spec to sell as then you can be confident that nothing has been forgotten and all the bits fit.
Thats what i would do if i were to offer a chassis for sale as "complete"
Ray :)

what i have in mind, done some research & putting things in place at the mo.

once my own car is complete i will take this further :)

andy

RAYLEE29
19th July 2009, 02:13 PM
I too have considered making "extra" components as i go along and offering them for sale but feel that i should know that the parts fit and are perfect so as to be able to sell with confidence.
as in the case of steering rack extensions if you buy ones made to the book it seems they are too long.
Ray :)

mr henderson
19th July 2009, 03:12 PM
Are there some doubts, then, as to whether or not Chris's design (as updated by the corrections published on this forum) works, then?

Apparently there are.

I can see building a prototype if the design was going to be altered, but sticking to the published design it should be OK, shouldn't it?

Anyway, getting back to the original question, are we all happy that the definition of complete chassis is, as suggested in the original post, just the welded central structure and doesn't include the roll-over bar and the pedal box?

One thing that concerns me with that definition is that without the roll-over baer there are no upper seat belt mountings.

flyerncle
19th July 2009, 05:56 PM
Building a car for yourself can include mods to suit your self and correct the differences from the original design that were missed from the book.
Nobody is 100% right all the time and Chris's car has been made to a spec that would not be allowed on the road if not roadworthy and safe,then we add the human element of the home builder.

Chris's design is well tested as Martin Keenan I believe had a helping hand in it and there are a lot of similar kits and cars around.
Surely Haynes would not have anything to do with it if it were not 100% safe and tested.
I hope your venture works out Mr Henderson,in this day and age it's nice to see someone making headway.

mr henderson
19th July 2009, 06:20 PM
I hope your venture works out Mr Henderson,in this day and age it's nice to see someone making headway.

Thanks you for the encouraging words. My main venture is helping other people build their cars, and that seems to be pretty much ongoing. I've got another two cars coming in this week. The chassis doings is pretty much a filling in thing, and a response to the difficulty I experienced when trying to buy one.

It will be a little while before I have one ready to sell because I am spending a lot of time on getting the equipment, the jig and the techniques right, instead of just steaming ahead. If, in the meantime, somebody else is able to produce and offer a chassis then I may well become a buyer instead of a seller. Just have to wait and see, I guess.

I'll be getting somebody else to do the welding, as I am neither quick enough nor neat enough. My assembly is good, though, and my material preparation spot on.

fabbyglass
19th July 2009, 07:26 PM
No problem with Chris's design but if someone intends to make chassis to sell on then they need to build a car and get it tested to prove it's safe....a drawing is just a drawing at the end of the day..

Good luck to anyone getting into the weird world of kit cars especially the way the world is these days, often makes me wonder why I did....:confused:

mr henderson
19th July 2009, 07:46 PM
No problem with Chris's design but if someone intends to make chassis to sell on then they need to build a car and get it tested to prove it's safe....a drawing is just a drawing at the end of the day..



But the problem with that is that the chassis being sold would not be the one that was being 'tested'.

I will be interested in hearing Chris G's thoughts on this one, whether he feels that a chassis built to the specs and dimensions given in his book, and ammended in line with the information published on this forum, would in any way be unsuitable for sale.

Personally I think the idea that a complete car needs to be built in order to test the design does rather fly in the face of both the published (and ammended) design and the cars that have already been built.

If what people are getting at is that the design might be OK, but my building of it might not be, then they should come out and say so directly. I have already said that it won't be me welding it, I will get a coded welder to do that, and it will be built to the published and ammended design and dimensions, so just what is the problem? Please be more specific in your replies.

fabbyglass
19th July 2009, 08:07 PM
Build a car and even non kit car folk will know what it is even if they do say "ooo it's a Westfield" make a chassis and 99% of folk won't know what it is.....simples!::p

fabbyglass
19th July 2009, 08:11 PM
Also there are welders and then there are fabricator/welders two different things....I know a bloke who can weld like you won't believe, it's annoying how neat it is yet ask him to work to drawings, cut steel and make something and he is buggered...coding covers a set welding procedure not actually making something and usually the test piece is done by someone else and all you have to do is weld it up correctly...not easy but doable;)

mr henderson
19th July 2009, 08:17 PM
Also there are welders and then there are fabricator/welders two different things....I know a bloke who can weld like you won't believe, it's annoying how neat it is yet ask him to work to drawings, cut steel and make something and he is buggered...coding covers a set welding procedure not actually making something and usually the test piece is done by someone else and all you have to do is weld it up correctly...not easy but doable;)

I'm sure you are trying to be helpful, but I wonder whether you are perhaps skimming what I have written (I know I tend to write long posts) rather than reading it. I have already said that I will be doing the material prepartion and assembly, and someone else will be welding it.

I may not be a fast fabricator, but I'm a bloody good one (not really 'talent' just obsessive attention to detail).

Oh, and by the way, the intention is only to offer chassis to people who already know what a Haynes Roadster is, so no need to build a complete car for the purpose of showing them.

fabbyglass
19th July 2009, 08:38 PM
Okey doke but still think anyone intending to get into doing this should build a car and show it off to try and convert non kit car folk into having a go at making their own kit.

Those that have met me know I talk rubbish most of the time anyway so I wouldn't listen to me If I was you........:confused:

mr henderson
19th July 2009, 08:47 PM
Okey doke but still think anyone intending to get into doing this should build a car and show it off to try and convert non kit car

No wish to convert non kit car folk, but if they come to my workshop there will usually be at least three kit cars here anyway, so if conversion is needed then I guess it can be accomplished.

Thanks for the advice, and as I did say earlier the only reason for wanting to build a chassis in the first place was so that I could have one on which to build one or more cars when other work is held up. What I was reacting to was the thought put forward by several posters that I had to make a complete car before I could offer anyone else a chassis, and this does seem illogical, hence my requesting more information about this rather odd sounding idea.

RAYLEE29
19th July 2009, 09:02 PM
Hello again,
it would seem that my comment about building a car first may have been taken in slightly the wrong context,
I was not doubting the integrity of the chassis design ( if i did i wouldnt have a 99% completete one sat in my workshop)
my point was more about the fact that there are still areas that people are having problems with and also you really will have to complete a car to know that all brackets required are actually there (i keep finding bits that are needed and i thought i had almost finished my chassis)
also there are quite afew brackets needed that you cant do until you decide on a rad or bodywork etc even just a bracket for the horn.
i would be alittle annoyed if i bought a"complete"chassis and later found i had to weld bits to it but thats just me
also if people buy a chassis and it is all there then you will get a good reputation but if people buy one and have to finish it by adding bits here taking off bits there then you will get a bad reputation
maybe some of these reasons are why others havent come up with the expected complete off the shlf chassis you were looking for
if you bought a westfield or caterham chassis would you expect it to be finished (no welding)
Ray:)

RAYLEE29
19th July 2009, 09:07 PM
OOH, my missus just said " how can u have a complete chasis with engine mounts if you dont know what engine type or size is going in it?? Yet another flaw to these complete chasis ideas, u would need to be building it to the buyers spec rather than just a run of the mill"
So there u go even a woman understands where i am coming from lol

fabbyglass
19th July 2009, 09:19 PM
You can make them to suit different engines, i used to do mounts for the Pinto, zetec, R1, Fireblade and zx9 so there were choices to be had. As for brackets for the rad etc these really should be on the chassis but most kits don't have them...:confused: And some have bodywork that doesn't fit but heyp thats kit cars for you....:D

The beauty of doing it yourself at home is you make it to suit what you have but a company has to draw a line somewhere or they all become "one offs" and unless folk pay "one off" money it won't be cost effective.

Same applies to grp, the moulds make what the moulds make and if anyone wants something different then a plug needs to be made and then a mould, this all takes time and money.

HandyAndy
19th July 2009, 09:23 PM
may i add my own personal thoughts on this.......

i,m am looking at producing complete chassis,s to sell on, whilst i have been building my own car i,m learning a great deal about as has been said about the little bits that need adding on even when you think you have completely finished welding, horn, rad brackets etc, also the engine mounting positions is something that would need to be finalised when the order is placed.

my feeling is if i,ve built my own car i would feel confident in giving advice to anyone that has a query, if i had experience of the query i would then offer a possible solution etc.

i am not knocking anyone,s way of how to go about their own builds or anyone wishing to supply a chassis, i just feel in myself that i would/have gained a hands on knowledge of the process to build a Roadster.

i wish all who take the decision to supply a chassis for selling on to a customer the very best of luck, & hope their venture is a prosperous one .

andy :)

andy

mr henderson
19th July 2009, 09:39 PM
maybe some of these reasons are why others havent come up with the expected complete off the shlf chassis you were looking for
if you bought a westfield or caterham chassis would you expect it to be finished (no welding)
Ray:)

I believe I see what you are getting at, but I think we are talking about two different things.

I am proposing to sell complete Haynes Roadster chassis as described in the book and subject to the ammendments published on this form. Now, if that is what someone wants that's great, and we will both be happy.

If, on the other hand, someone wants to fit for instance, a SOHC Ford V8 with a Tremec box then what I am selling isn't going to suit them, so either they can buy it knowing that they are going to have to modify it, or order it, and supply the power unit and let me make the required modifications, and pay the extra, or....... not buy it.

I really can't see how my having made a pinto-engined standard roadster chassis is going to have the slightest impact on the example described above.

Please bear in mind I spend all day building and modifying kit cars, so I do have some idea of what is involved. As a for instance of that I will not be doing the CP16 as in the book (the plate that the steering column passes through), but instead will modify it to receive a proper bearing which I will supply.

I hope that reassures all those who feel that I need to build a complete example before I can offer a chassis to anyone else

Bonzo
19th July 2009, 09:39 PM
I might be wrong but I think the book engine mounts are more or less OK as is :)

Why do I say this !!??

The book was based on the Pinto engine.

I had originally tacked my engine mounts up exactly to the book spec.

Test fitted a CVH engine, The only work needed to be done was to slot the holes ;)

Now I am going to go the Zetec route. Test measurements show that by fabricating engine mounting arms to suit the Zetec engine & the book spec mounts will be fine as is. :)

If I were to produce a chassis for re-sale, I would slot the enine mount holes as a matter of course.

I'll try to post a picture as soon as I can

Aftermarket Zetec engine mounting arms are available, off the shelf. Cost an arm & a leg for what they are though :eek:

fabbyglass
19th July 2009, 09:49 PM
The MK etc are designed for the pinto if you want to fit owt else thats up to you think that goes for most kit cars really as impossible for them to cater for every engine out there.

Eddy
19th July 2009, 10:04 PM
Found this post interesting because it talks about exactly what I'll be looking to buy in 5 months time.

I think that a complete chassis should require no further welding, but would anticipate certain aspects to be made universal (such as the slotted engine mounts mentioned)

fabbyglass
19th July 2009, 10:09 PM
Watch this space then matey....;)

HandyAndy
19th July 2009, 10:19 PM
Found this post interesting because it talks about exactly what I'll be looking to buy in 5 months time.

I think that a complete chassis should require no further welding, but would anticipate certain aspects to be made universal (such as the slotted engine mounts mentioned)

Hi Eddy,

may i ask where are you located?

andy:)

mr henderson
19th July 2009, 10:28 PM
I think that a complete chassis should require no further welding, but would anticipate certain aspects to be made universal (such as the slotted engine mounts mentioned)

That could be done, of course, bt is not necessarily the best solution.

If I was buying a ready made chassis I would prefer no drilling of the engine mount plates, and would drill them to suit my own set up. It's not unknown for engines to move where slots allow them to

HandyAndy
19th July 2009, 10:35 PM
That could be done, of course, bt is not necessarily the best solution.

If I was buying a ready made chassis I would prefer no drilling of the engine mount plates, and would drill them to suit my own set up. It's not unknown for engines to move where slots allow them to

this is then where the discussion with the customers "wish list" & donor engine choice can be incorporated into the building of the chassis can come in .

andy

Bonzo
19th July 2009, 11:07 PM
That could be done, of course, bt is not necessarily the best solution.

If I was buying a ready made chassis I would prefer no drilling of the engine mount plates, and would drill them to suit my own set up. It's not unknown for engines to move where slots allow them to

I have to dissagree with that one !!??

Many production cars use oversize engine mounting holes. with the use of the correct fixings & tightened correctly, there is no reason for the engine to move ??.
In any event, it would need both fixings to become loose in order for the engine to move ;)

If it were an unsafe practice to slot holes, it would not be allowed under the IVA regulations.

Remove a Ford Escort subframe & inspect the clearance holes in them :eek: :eek:

They require the use of large temporary locating pins to allow the correct alignment of the subframe.
I would say that a subframe is under a lot more stress than an engine !!??

That's my thoughts for what they are worth.

les g
19th July 2009, 11:20 PM
wow a bit of a lively subject this one.........
well done everyone for provoking a bit of dialogue .....
as for slots and holes.......
i,m with Ronnie !!!!
slots are ok ..........its the clamping force that provides the security and retention of the bolted together bits
cheers les g

Bonzo
19th July 2009, 11:26 PM
I would imagine that in your line of work Les, you must come across some hefty MF slot fixed components :eek: :eek:
I have seen some beautys on some of the agricultural stuff ;)

mr henderson
20th July 2009, 08:19 AM
I have to dissagree with that one !!??

Many production cars use oversize engine mounting holes. with the use of the correct fixings & tightened correctly, there is no reason for the engine to move ??.
In any event, it would need both fixings to become loose in order for the engine to move ;)

If it were an unsafe practice to slot holes, it would not be allowed under the IVA regulations.

Remove a Ford Escort subframe & inspect the clearance holes in them :eek: :eek:

They require the use of large temporary locating pins to allow the correct alignment of the subframe.
I would say that a subframe is under a lot more stress than an engine !!??

That's my thoughts for what they are worth.

I'm very well aware that many production cars use a good many slots in their engine mountings and oversize holes for subframes, Ford Mondeos certainly do and presumably all other similar cars.

However, and to be fair, this discussion does have a context, and the context is the Haynes Roadster. With the type of engine mountings used in the book I would not use slots if it could possibly be avoided.

Reasons-

How much torque should this type of rubber mounting be subjected to? I don't have any workshop manuals featuring this type to hand, but basically it's a flat plate bonded to rubber, and surely should not be tightened beyond a moderate amount.

If just isn't necessary. In a production situation makers are working to tolerances and need to be sure that any slight variations in the different components can be compensated for by lining up the parts and then tightening the fixings wherever they happen to be in the slots. But in our situation we are fitting a specific engine to a specific chassis. Much better to offer up the engine, mark the mounting plates where the bolts make contact, then drill the plates and get the exact fit, and keep it! without having to tighten the nuts to provide the clamping force that would be needed to resist any possible movement.

Anyway, I did say "not necessarily":)

Eddy
20th July 2009, 08:59 AM
HandyAndy - I live in East Kent, close to Margate.

I didn't mean that I would want slotted engine mounts, its just what I would have expected from a completed chassis. I think the person selling their completed chassis would want to appeal to as many people as possible, so would try to allow for the widest range of engines possible without the need for modification.

mr henderson
20th July 2009, 09:07 AM
HandyAndy - I live in East Kent, close to Margate.

I didn't mean that I would want slotted engine mounts, its just what I would have expected from a completed chassis. I think the person selling their completed chassis would want to appeal to as many people as possible, so would try to allow for the widest range of engines possible without the need for modification.

Simply not possible, I'm afraid. A nice idea but impractical in reality, there are far too many variables.

Much better for the maker to modify the design to suit a particular power unit, which either they might have to hand, or which the customer would have to provide.

Having made engine mountings for various cars, and modified chassis to suit, I know that there is no way of providing a 'universal' chassis. Slots alone would be nowhere near enough, the mountings would have to be able to move in 3 dimensions and by a considerable amount.

Eddy
20th July 2009, 09:32 AM
In terms of the Roadster though, Ronnie said yesterday that the mounts for the Zetec, Pinto and CVH are all reasonably close.

If they are close enough it would be possible to make one chassis that can take all 3 engine types without modification

I know its not entirely universal, but would give people buying a complete chassis some options...

HandyAndy
20th July 2009, 09:34 AM
i would look to confirm the donor engine choice & fit the engine mounts relevant to the position that is needed.

its a case of communication between the customer & the chassis builder :)

andy

fabbyglass
20th July 2009, 10:00 AM
It is possible to allow for at least 5 car motors and maybe more bike motors without altering Chris's most luvvly design...;)

RAYLEE29
20th July 2009, 11:14 AM
[QUOTE=mr henderson;18258]Reasons-

How much torque should this type of rubber mounting be subjected to? I don't have any workshop manuals featuring this type to hand, but basically it's a flat plate bonded to rubber, and surely should not be tightened beyond a moderate amount.


Hmm I dont know what sierra your mounts come off but mine are certainly not just a flat plate bonded to rubber.
I think that slotted chassis would be fine but if you were worried about movement there are engineering ways around this a simple engine type specific plate bolted onto the chassis would stop any movement.
or just make different engine side mounts to suit a standard position hole
I only entered this conversation as ive built my chassis and knw there are pitfalls to thinking you can just buid to the book
for instance mr henderson show me where in the book are the dimensions for the standard engine/g/box mounts i assure you you need to fit an engine to find the positions or copy someone elses as there are no dimensions in the book.

fabbyglass
20th July 2009, 11:46 AM
In terms of the Roadster though, Ronnie said yesterday that the mounts for the Zetec, Pinto and CVH are all reasonably close.

If they are close enough it would be possible to make one chassis that can take all 3 engine types without modification

I know its not entirely universal, but would give people buying a complete chassis some options...

One chassis can suit at least 5 car motors and 5 or more bike motors without changing the chassis...change the chassis and you run the risk of nobodies bodywork fitting. I know mine fits Chris's design because I made a chassis first then used that to make sure it all fitted nice and snug like.

Also from what I understand of the IVA you are best sticking to the Donor engine and gearbox anyway unless that ratty Sierra was fitted with 'Busa motor prior to being used as a donor then no worries...:confused:

mr henderson
20th July 2009, 01:04 PM
Hmm I dont know what sierra your mounts come off but mine are certainly not just a flat plate bonded to rubber.



I'm referring to the type of rubber engine mounting shown in the book, sometimes referred to as a bobbin, and they are indeed made by bonding the flat metal plate that the stud is atteched to to the rubber, how else would they be made, and still be flexible?




I think that slotted chassis would be fine but if you were worried about movement there are engineering ways around this a simple engine type specific plate bolted onto the chassis would stop any movement.



I'm not worried about the movement, why would I be worried, if the builder isn't capable of drilling 2 holes in the flat plates provided on the book chassis to accept the rubber mountings, then he is going to have a very hard time of it. The obvious sensible solution is to leave the plates undrilled, and allow the builder to place the holes as required. No slots required.




i assure you you need to fit an engine to find the positions or copy someone elses as there are no dimensions in the book.

Absolutely, and that is what the builder, not the chassis maker, is going to do. Simple. Two holes. No problemo

Hope that reassures you

RAYLEE29
20th July 2009, 02:50 PM
Thank you very much for your concern but I can assure you that I was never worried about any of the above points. As I have no intention of buying a chassis from you as ive already built my first one and its in my workshop with an engine/g/box fitted modded brackets to fit 7.5" diff and the complete front suspension on it too.
As always my comments are always meant to be helpful and hopefully knowlegable. it would seem you dont know what a sierra engine mount rubber looks like but im sure you will find out
do you live anywhere near poole ,dorset? I would be happy to show you one lol ;)

mr henderson
20th July 2009, 05:51 PM
Thank you very much for your concern but I can assure you that I was never worried about any of the above points. As I have no intention of buying a chassis from you as ive already built my first one and its in my workshop with an engine/g/box fitted modded brackets to fit 7.5" diff and the complete front suspension on it too.
As always my comments are always meant to be helpful and hopefully knowlegable. it would seem you dont know what a sierra engine mount rubber looks like but im sure you will find out
do you live anywhere near poole ,dorset? I would be happy to show you one lol ;)

I have no idea why you are keeping on with this, and I am starting to detect an unpleasant edge to your responses. I really can't be bothered with this sort of thing anymore so am not going to respond to your next post on the subject.

les g
20th July 2009, 05:56 PM
I have no idea why you are keeping on with this, and I am starting to detect an unpleasant edge to your responses. I really can't be bothered with this sort of thing anymore so am not going to respond to your next post on the subject.

Thank Fuck For That
les g

HandyAndy
20th July 2009, 06:05 PM
Thank Fuck For That
les g


:D :D

it took a while

andy

flyerncle
20th July 2009, 07:21 PM
Maybe this will end it all.
Buy the book make a chassis,Buy a chassis build a car.

The only thing you have with the book is the plans to make a chassis and turn it into a car no come backs.
Buy a chassis from someone,you get product liability,sale of goods act,duty of care etc etc etc,need I go on any more.
The original question was what constituted a full chassis to buy.

les g
20th July 2009, 09:21 PM
I thought this hobby was all about personal choice

if you want a standard car go and buy one end of !!!!!!
cheers les g

PS can you get different color rubber engine mounts and what do they look like :D

Bonzo
20th July 2009, 10:02 PM
PS can you get different color rubber engine mounts and what do they look like :D

Probably Les ;)

They are sort of round, with a couple of sticky out bits that could be used to nuts on.
Don't do them up too tight though, You risk pulling the captive bolt through the plate that has been bonded to the rubber :D :D

les g
20th July 2009, 10:08 PM
cheers for that bonzo :cool:
do you have a brochure showing the different colors and styles please ;)
cheers les g

Ps : could i not just leather the sticky out bits with a ball pein hammer and sort of rivet the engine down ??:rolleyes:

Bonzo
20th July 2009, 10:26 PM
I can only lay my hands on Pink ones at the moment :eek:

The rivet idea might be a problem !!??

When you twat the sticky out bit with the MF hammer it is liable to bounce back & twat you in the face :D :D

Best wear some decent goggles :cool:

fabbyglass
20th July 2009, 10:38 PM
'glass the thing in then it won't move....;)

RAYLEE29
20th July 2009, 10:53 PM
OH dear I think my sarcasm has upset someone
Im sorry if I upset anyone dont know what gets into me sometimes
Ray:)

fabbyglass
20th July 2009, 10:59 PM
Tut tut....:rolleyes:

RAYLEE29
20th July 2009, 11:03 PM
hmm dont ban me pleeease :D

Bonzo
20th July 2009, 11:29 PM
OH dear I think my sarcasm has upset someone
Im sorry if I upset anyone dont know what gets into me sometimes
Ray:)

I have no problems with the contents of your posts Ray :cool:

A honour to have a man of your caliber as a member of this forum, let's hope you don't get fired :D

I,ll get my coat for that pun :o

RAYLEE29
21st July 2009, 11:18 AM
Thanks ill be stuck in the house all day now (cant get my head through the door lol)
Ray:o

HandyAndy
21st July 2009, 11:22 AM
Thanks ill be stuck in the house all day now (cant get my head through the door lol)
Ray:o

just squeeze it thru the garage door & get building :D :D

watch out for those "pesky" pink engine mounts, they clash with the engine block :D

andy

flyerncle
21st July 2009, 05:57 PM
Evil buggers !

les g
21st July 2009, 07:49 PM
Me offended not at all
i just cant help meself at times
i,ve just got one of those sense of humours
cheers les g