Haynes Forums

Haynes Forums (http://www.haynes.co.uk/forums/index.php)
-   Running gear (http://www.haynes.co.uk/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=5)
-   -   brake facts... (http://www.haynes.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?t=8631)

jps 4th November 2012 10:26 PM

brake facts...
 
Just so I've got this right, Sierra brake lines are 3/16 but with a metric M10 1.0 fitting on the ends right? Seems an odd combo of imperial and metric...

Also, any reasons not to salvage the pipe fittings from the donor and use them with new pipework?

SeriesLandy 4th November 2012 10:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jps (Post 79963)
Just so I've got this right, Sierra brake lines are 3/16 but with a metric M10 1.0 fitting on the ends right? Seems an odd combo of imperial and metric...

Also, any reasons not to salvage the pipe fittings from the donor and use them with new pipework?

Yes that is correct.
1 reason is new ones are so cheap it would be idiotic to trust a second hand part that is over 20 years old sat in all the road grime and salt with your life.

Said in the nicest of ways :D

robo 4th November 2012 10:42 PM

The pipe size thing in imperial will probably be here for ever. Can you imagine the confusion if they brought in 5mm brake pipe. Its the same with tyres on imperial rim diameters with metric widths. Sheet material is still imperial in width and metric length. Or is it the other way round:confused: :)

Bob

alga 5th November 2012 07:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jps (Post 79963)
Just so I've got this right, Sierra brake lines are 3/16 but with a metric M10 1.0 fitting on the ends right? Seems an odd combo of imperial and metric...

Also, any reasons not to salvage the pipe fittings from the donor and use them with new pipework?

*Shrug*, the diameter of 4.8 mm looks metric enough to me! ;)

Brake line fittings cost just a bit more than normal nuts and bolts, you'd spend just around £5 for all new shiny fittings. So, same reason why you use new bolts where you can.

robo 5th November 2012 07:55 AM

4.74mm sounds a bit less metric :p

Bob:)

jps 5th November 2012 10:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SeriesLandy (Post 79964)
Yes that is correct.
1 reason is new ones are so cheap it would be idiotic to trust a second hand part that is over 20 years old sat in all the road grime and salt with your life.

Said in the nicest of ways :D

Getting you loud and clear :-D I only asked as when I took the master cylinder out they basically looked spotless!

alga 5th November 2012 11:50 AM

My brake flairing set has a 4.8 mm die, the lines I bougt were ⌀4.8. You can call it 3/16" if you want, but 4.8 mm is a proper metric equivalent.

flyerncle 5th November 2012 12:19 PM

Decimalisation and metrication was forced upon us by Europe,does not mean we have to like it.:p

jps 5th November 2012 04:33 PM

Feel free to call me 'Noddy' but would something like this be a perfect buy for a Roadster brake installation?

http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/3-16-BRAKE...-/250851152507

robo 5th November 2012 04:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by flyerncle (Post 79983)
Decimalisation and metrication was forced upon us by Europe,does not mean we have to like it.:p

I dont think metric will ever be totally embraced. the yanks for one dont seem keen to give up the gallons,miles,feet and inches,pounds ,stones etc , there are dozens of other countries happy to stay imperial.:)

Bob


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:16 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.