Thread: Engine In Mule
View Single Post
  #13  
Old 5th July 2012, 08:15 AM
robo robo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: scabs
Posts: 1,722
Default

The reason I am using the ford 302 is because its a real lightweight. I have weighed it against a pinto [dry] and its about 3kg heavier. If I shove ali heads on it becomes about 15 kg lighter. The power thing is a non issue because there is a throttle pedal fitted not an on/off switch. A guy up the road took me for a spin in a caterham that was making about 300hp and there were no wheelspin problems , it just dug in and f@@ked off. This has been covered before ,yes if you stamp on the loud pedal it wil swap ends but that is true of any high hp car. That car of yours will not be a problem just get used to it slowly.

Bob

edit from hp books


A very compact design, the small block engine utilizes a thin-wall block casting not extended below the crankshaft centerline. Expanded to include the 260, 289, and 302, the engine family has provided power for most of Fords model lineup. Cylinder bore spacing is 4.38", the same as the Cleveland family. The small block is externally one of the smallest V-8 engines made, and total engine weight is around 460 lbs. The 289 was produced from 1963 to 1968.

In 1963 Ford released the 289 High Performance
which produced 271 BHP @ 6000 RPM.
__________________
When The Results Disagree With The Theory: Believe The Results And Invent A New Theory
If I had two brains I,d still be a halfwit

The cave http://s1116.photobucket.com/user/my...deshow/mancave

The build http://www.haynes.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?t=12669

Last edited by robo : 5th July 2012 at 09:06 PM.
Reply With Quote