Haynes Forums  

Go Back   Haynes Forums > Haynes Roadster Forums > Bodywork and interior
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 18th February 2012, 12:02 PM
baz-r baz-r is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,464
Default

i have found that grit faced tools for tiles are brillent for cutting grp (jigsaw and hole cutting tools).
minimal chipping of gel and i use blades in my jigsaw free hand without touching the shoe on the panel if i need to do cuts from the outside.
finally opening out to the finished line with a sanding drum or disc.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 28th February 2012, 06:23 PM
tex tex is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: stockton on tees
Posts: 119
Default

you could of made a flared side panel instead - if you cut the panel out from where the scuttle lower front touches the side panel - chop out the engine bay sides then either replace with ally but make the rear edge further out from the body allowing air out - front sits in same place

like this

http://forum.wscc.co.uk/forum/index...._fromsearch__1

looks really cool - if you use ally you can leave it bare - looks pretty
or carbon -
or - - - grp? needs a mould which shouldnt be hard to do - maybe then sell them on to other haynes users? could be a little earner
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 28th February 2012, 09:09 PM
shh120m's Avatar
shh120m shh120m is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: thirsk
Posts: 557
Default

thats got me thinking, i could quite easily churn out a 'locost' version of these for the haynes, using prepreg backed with grp to keep costs down. Would certainly consider making some up if the demand was there. Would have to add a radius to the rear vent to keep them iva freindly.
__________________
A few build photos... www.photobucket.com/ntsengineering
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 29th February 2012, 09:22 AM
MarkB MarkB is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: naughty step most of the time
Posts: 494
Default

prepreg isn't locost though
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 29th February 2012, 09:39 AM
shh120m's Avatar
shh120m shh120m is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: thirsk
Posts: 557
Default

It is if youve got the facility to prepreg the twill granted its not cheap, but its certainly not mega bucks, thats why there would need to be interest first.
__________________
A few build photos... www.photobucket.com/ntsengineering
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 29th February 2012, 11:40 AM
MarkB MarkB is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: naughty step most of the time
Posts: 494
Default

So are we to see a full Roadster in carbon fibre soon then?
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 29th February 2012, 06:02 PM
chrisponter chrisponter is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Romford, Essex
Posts: 62
Default

I'd certainly think about buying carbon bodywork when the time comes. Depending on price and weight.

Anyone know what the weight difference between GRP and Carbon Fibre is?
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 29th February 2012, 08:33 PM
shh120m's Avatar
shh120m shh120m is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: thirsk
Posts: 557
Default

theres two ways of doing it:

1 layer of carbon fibre twill matting at 120g/sm impregnated with epoxy is mega strong (at least as strong as 2 or 3 layers of polyester and chopstrand glass) and also very light for exanple a side panel would weigh about 500g. This is 'proper' structural carbon fibre like f1 parts etc. This is pretty expensive because epoxy is a pig to work with and because its so sticky and horrid the only way to get a perfect finish is to vac-bag everything, the tape and bags cost a fortune, and there is alot of wasted materials, another way is to use an autoclave which again pushes up the cost to the customer.

or

1 layer of carbon fibre twill impregnated with polyester, but due to the structural properties of polyester resin with cloth it would have to be backed up with chopped strand matting to give it some rigidity, so cosmetically its real carbon fibre, but its reinforced behind. This is the cheaper way to do it because no expensive epoxy is required, its alot easier to work with than epoxy and there is no need on most items for the vacumn pump. The weight works out about the same, if not a little lighter because you are replaceing say 1kg of gelcoat with the equivilent of 120-150gram of twill.
__________________
A few build photos... www.photobucket.com/ntsengineering

Last edited by shh120m : 29th February 2012 at 08:44 PM. Reason: forgot to say a couple more things doh
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 29th February 2012, 09:09 PM
MarkB MarkB is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: naughty step most of the time
Posts: 494
Default

You don't get waste or mess or even a nasty stink with vac bagging and it's far superior than hand lay up as it ensures an even spread of the resin.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 29th February 2012, 11:17 PM
PorkChop PorkChop is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 394
Default

I'd be up for flared side panels (but not necessarily in CF; I reckon FG would be fairly popular too).
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:28 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.