Haynes Forums  

Go Back   Haynes Forums > Haynes Roadster Forums > Chassis
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 8th May 2011, 09:08 PM
KAMBO KAMBO is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 43
Default just wondering ?

how much less would a chassis weigh if built in 2mm wall ali box section ?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 8th May 2011, 09:25 PM
monsterob monsterob is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: crewe
Posts: 400
Default

have a search but i think the general concencus was ali is a different material and has different properties so wouldnt be suitable
__________________
theres a box ! im not allowed in it ! i have to think outside !
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 8th May 2011, 09:33 PM
acra acra is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 35
Default

I'd expect Aluminium to show signs of fatigue stress a lot sooner than steel with worse results, based on when I was looking for a new push bike.

That said, it is used in aircraft structures, so I guess it's feasible? Damn expensive though I'd imagine!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 8th May 2011, 09:37 PM
jerkins's Avatar
jerkins jerkins is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Silly Suffolk
Posts: 41
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by acra View Post
That said, it is used in aircraft structures, so I guess it's feasible?
Aircraft get stripped down and thoroughly inspected at regular intervals - and they tend not to get the same pounding as a road-going car.

This has been discussed many times in several forums - the general opinion is that aluminium will suffer from fatigue cracking very quickly. It also age-hardens, which wouldn't help. So - OK for race cars, but not for road-going ones.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 8th May 2011, 09:41 PM
twinturbo's Avatar
twinturbo twinturbo is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Carlisle
Posts: 4,389
Default

It would most probably way more to retain the require strength. The design does not lend itself to the material.

TT
__________________
You only get a woosh with a dump valve

Build Thread


Man Cave Mantiques



Cecil Street Auto Repairs Garage Carlisle




Build Cost £4181.65 - Last - Wheel Cylinders
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 8th May 2011, 09:59 PM
leroybrown911 leroybrown911 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: North Wales
Posts: 236
Default

Aircraft actually take more of a hammering than a road car, its the buid philosiphy that makes it work. Steel is more practical than ali for a road car (that does not have to fly!)
__________________
My Blog : leroysroadster.wordpress.com
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 8th May 2011, 10:26 PM
AshG's Avatar
AshG AshG is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Rochester
Posts: 1,882
Default

planes are not welded for a start so there is no haz, they are made with screws rivets and glue. if you look back a bit into the history of planes there has been plenty of issues with ali fatigue look at the de Havilland Comet, they had a habit of falling apart in the air as did a fair few other planes that were conceived in the 50's. a lot of the new planes manufactured these days are made out of composite materials which are much stronger and lighter.

ali is a fantastic material but its really not suited to use on a chassis unless you can model it and do some fea to work out the issues due to the shortcomings of the material
__________________
My Roadster Is Finished NerNer.......
Pigs can fly, you just have to carry them onto the plane.

My Pictures
http://s707.photobucket.com/user/ashgardiner/profile/
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 9th May 2011, 07:14 AM
Wynand's Avatar
Wynand Wynand is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: South Africa
Posts: 173
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by KAMBO View Post
how much less would a chassis weigh if built in 2mm wall ali box section ?
Steel weigh about 8750kg/cubic meter and aluminum about 2600kg/cubic meter - thus ally is about 3.37 times lighter than steel. Sounds good, but to get to the same tensile strength as steel, you have to up the thickness to be on par with steel.
When I built/ designed ocean going yachts for a living before retiring, many designs were built either in steel or aluminum. But overall the ally went 30% in size, thickness etc to comply to the same scantling as steel, but still these yachts turned out much lighter than their steel counter parts....

Back to the subject at hand; since we use 25 x 25 x 1.6mm tube for the frame, a meter length will weigh about 1.256kg. The equivalent in ally to be used should be 25 x 25 x 2.0mm and a meter length will weigh about 0.52 kg.
But to be absolutely safe you can up the ally to 25 x 25 x 3.0mm and a meter length will weigh only 0.78kg and a frame built of this over sized grade will be much stronger than the std steel frame and still be 38% lighter!
__________________
Cheers

Wynand
http://5psi.net
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 9th May 2011, 10:51 AM
KAMBO KAMBO is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 43
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wynand View Post
Steel weigh about 8750kg/cubic meter and aluminum about 2600kg/cubic meter - thus ally is about 3.37 times lighter than steel. Sounds good, but to get to the same tensile strength as steel, you have to up the thickness to be on par with steel.
When I built/ designed ocean going yachts for a living before retiring, many designs were built either in steel or aluminum. But overall the ally went 30% in size, thickness etc to comply to the same scantling as steel, but still these yachts turned out much lighter than their steel counter parts....

Back to the subject at hand; since we use 25 x 25 x 1.6mm tube for the frame, a meter length will weigh about 1.256kg. The equivalent in ally to be used should be 25 x 25 x 2.0mm and a meter length will weigh about 0.52 kg.
But to be absolutely safe you can up the ally to 25 x 25 x 3.0mm and a meter length will weigh only 0.78kg and a frame built of this over sized grade will be much stronger than the std steel frame and still be 38% lighter!



I was thinking 2 to 3 mm myself...........wow 38% lighter ..........looks like a plan for my trackday car then
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 9th May 2011, 05:31 PM
TheArf TheArf is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Wrexham North Wales
Posts: 1,041
Default

It might be a good idea to listen to leroybrown he knows what he is talking about when it comes to aircraft and the hammering they take

Arfon
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:19 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.