Haynes Forums  

Go Back   Haynes Forums > Haynes Roadster Forums > Engine/transmission
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 29th January 2011, 09:05 PM
ayjay ayjay is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Coedpoeth near Wrexham, North Wales
Posts: 737
Question Sump capacity

I'm about to modify the sump on my cvh engine.

How important is it to restore the sump capacity if Im only chopping 30mm or so off the deep part of the sump.

I'm considering not bothering with the extension bit of the mod.

Any thought on the matter would be appreciated.

ps when I get someone to show me how to do it I'll post some pics but nothing exciting yet. (how many chassis does anyone need to see!)

Adrian
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 29th January 2011, 09:18 PM
flyerncle flyerncle is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: gateshead,near cobbly bit of A1 North
Posts: 3,188
Default

Cool's aswell as lubes,more is better.

Old group 4 escorts had big wings welded to sump to increase capacity.
__________________
Cost : Little as possible.
Thanks : To those who by their generosity my build has progressed.
Its a handmade sports car not a flaming kit car !!!


If at first you dont succeed,avoid skydiving...

No parachute require to freefall,only if you want to do it twice.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 30th January 2011, 10:30 AM
Big Vern Big Vern is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Milton Keynes
Posts: 320
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ayjay View Post
I'm about to modify the sump on my cvh engine.

How important is it to restore the sump capacity if Im only chopping 30mm or so off the deep part of the sump.

I'm considering not bothering with the extension bit of the mod.

Any thought on the matter would be appreciated.

ps when I get someone to show me how to do it I'll post some pics but nothing exciting yet. (how many chassis does anyone need to see!)

Adrian

HI Adrian,

The volume of oil in the sump pan is determined by how much oil is circulating round the engine as max revs. If you reduce the volume of oil by not doing the extension then the engine will suffer oil starvation at high revs followed rapidly by failure!
Do not be tempted just to raise the oil level above the max mark on the dipstick - it's there for a reason - The crank and rods will dip into the oil when the level is raised causing major problems, loss of power and even crank failure.
The extension is not hard to do compared to some of the other tasks on the haynes roadster, its not a short cut as you'll be doing it later when you fit a replacement engine!!!


BV.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 30th January 2011, 10:40 AM
flyerncle flyerncle is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: gateshead,near cobbly bit of A1 North
Posts: 3,188
Default

As Vern say's raising the oil level is a bad idea as it also increases the possibility of oil mist entering the breather system and getting sucked into the engine and getting burnt making it very smokey.
__________________
Cost : Little as possible.
Thanks : To those who by their generosity my build has progressed.
Its a handmade sports car not a flaming kit car !!!


If at first you dont succeed,avoid skydiving...

No parachute require to freefall,only if you want to do it twice.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 30th January 2011, 11:01 AM
alga's Avatar
alga alga is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Vilnius, Lithuania
Posts: 1,249
Default

But then again, 1 l is about the amount of oil between the upper and lower dipstick marks. So when you'll have oil topped up to the MAX mark, the amount of oil will be the same as is on an unmodified sump on the MIN mark. Surely there are some safety margins either way. If the oil level is carefully monitored, it should be fine.
__________________
Albert
Haynes Roadster FAQ | Haynes Builder Locations
Gallery, build thread in Lithuanian / via Google Translate.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 30th January 2011, 03:55 PM
baz-r baz-r is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,464
Default

not a good idea if you ask me

think of all the sloshing around as you brake and corner hard

its not a hard job and its not a expensive job i would do it load easyer than trying to sort an oil starved engine!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 31st January 2011, 01:14 PM
Big Vern Big Vern is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Milton Keynes
Posts: 320
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by alga View Post
But then again, 1 l is about the amount of oil between the upper and lower dipstick marks. So when you'll have oil topped up to the MAX mark, the amount of oil will be the same as is on an unmodified sump on the MIN mark. Surely there are some safety margins either way. If the oil level is carefully monitored, it should be fine.
When you run at the minimum mark, at max intermittant revs (6350 for the Pinto) as specified by Ford there is only 0.75 litre left in the sump pan which is about 20mm. The pick up pipe is 6mm from the sump pan floor!
At 7300 revs the pick up starts to draw air - I found out the hard way
It's made worse because at high revs and higher blow-by the oil can't drain back from the head properly.

The margin of error is the difference between min and max.


BV.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 31st January 2011, 09:56 PM
alga's Avatar
alga alga is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Vilnius, Lithuania
Posts: 1,249
Default

I stand corrected. Then, there's a dilemma there: whether to leave the bottom of the sump narrow, so that the remaining small amount of oil has some depth, or to have more oil spread over a larger area with an extended bottom.
__________________
Albert
Haynes Roadster FAQ | Haynes Builder Locations
Gallery, build thread in Lithuanian / via Google Translate.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 31st January 2011, 10:15 PM
ayjay ayjay is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Coedpoeth near Wrexham, North Wales
Posts: 737
Default

confused or wot!
The words can and worm spring to mind
Thanks for all the wise comments .There are more things to consider than I realised.
On balance it seems best to take no chances and dont "spoil the ship----etc"

Thanks all

Adrian
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:48 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.