Haynes Forums  

Go Back   Haynes Forums > Haynes Roadster Forums > Engine/transmission
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 24th April 2012, 12:00 PM
Davidbolam Davidbolam is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Gosforth, Newcastle Upon Tyne
Posts: 856
Default Sump Clearence

I am at the stage whe I am going to install my engine and fabricate the engine mounts. I am using a 1.6 MX5 engine and want to keep this as low as possible without having to modify the sump.

My question is what how far under the lower chassis rails should the sump sit?

If I do go down the route of modifying the sump. How much is safe to remove before there won't be enough oil in the engine?
__________________
Click to see my build photos on Flikr

http://www.flickr.com/photos/67112582@N03/

Saturn MX5 Based Chassis, Limited Slip Diff & 2.4 Quick Rack.

Build cost.... seems to be spending more on tools than car bits at the moment! (they will be handy in the future though).
Car iva'd and passed 15/08/2014. Finished weight 572kg.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 24th April 2012, 12:39 PM
brainbug007's Avatar
brainbug007 brainbug007 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Weston-Super-Mare
Posts: 846
Default

Personally I wouldn't have the sump below the bottom rails at all as there's too much risk of catching it something while driving.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 24th April 2012, 01:54 PM
skov's Avatar
skov skov is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,085
Default

I've gone for 40mm below the chassis rails, as per Spud's advice.
I am terrified about grinding the sump off, but if you position the engine any higher you'll struggle to get it under the bonnet!

I don't know if he's tried it or not yet, but Johno has done a load of research on chopping the MX5 sump and was planning to give it a go.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 24th April 2012, 02:58 PM
Davidbolam Davidbolam is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Gosforth, Newcastle Upon Tyne
Posts: 856
Default

cheers. I wonder if he fancies welding mine! I don't
__________________
Click to see my build photos on Flikr

http://www.flickr.com/photos/67112582@N03/

Saturn MX5 Based Chassis, Limited Slip Diff & 2.4 Quick Rack.

Build cost.... seems to be spending more on tools than car bits at the moment! (they will be handy in the future though).
Car iva'd and passed 15/08/2014. Finished weight 572kg.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 24th April 2012, 07:23 PM
stew stew is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Perthshire
Posts: 58
Default

i was gonna go for 40mm as well, but will be chopping my ali sump. or thats the plan anyway!
__________________
Stew
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 24th April 2012, 08:13 PM
alga's Avatar
alga alga is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Vilnius, Lithuania
Posts: 1,249
Default

According to this thread on pistonheads, on some Caterhams and Westfields the sump is hanging ~6 cm below the chassis. So I guess the book recommended 25 mm for the Ford engine/box or 40 mm for MX-5 components are not too bad, really.
__________________
Albert
Haynes Roadster FAQ | Haynes Builder Locations
Gallery, build thread in Lithuanian / via Google Translate.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 25th April 2012, 08:40 PM
Johno's Avatar
Johno Johno is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Lutton (East Anglia)
Posts: 497
Default

Hiya,
As Skov has said 40mm below chassis rail, any higher and you will have problems with the air inlet manifold fouling the bonnet...
I haven't chopped my sump yet but you can take about 30mm off and loose about 1/2 litre of oil approx.
Still in two minds about doing it but I change my mind everyday...LOL
I'm going to change the sump gasket this weekend (along with the rest of the other parts I have stripped off the engine) so if I'm going to do it I will post the photos Sunday evening.
Sorry but been reluctant to post progress of my build just recently as I started WW3 with just asking Nathan about posting piccy's of his MX5 build (just got out of hand).

Johno
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 25th April 2012, 08:51 PM
flyerncle flyerncle is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: gateshead,near cobbly bit of A1 North
Posts: 3,188
Default

Wings could be added to the sides of the sump,group 4 escorts had big wing sumps to add capacity.
__________________
Cost : Little as possible.
Thanks : To those who by their generosity my build has progressed.
Its a handmade sports car not a flaming kit car !!!


If at first you dont succeed,avoid skydiving...

No parachute require to freefall,only if you want to do it twice.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 26th April 2012, 08:49 AM
robo robo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: scabs
Posts: 1,722
Default

Wings are the way to go for capacity but the skidplate thing is a bit of a must really. I have seen an engine trashed over a wack in the sump. not because of a leak but from the sump closing the gap between the pickup filter. It was letting enough oil through to put out the light but at high rpm starved the ends.Game over. You could always add two pieces of box to the underside rails each side of the engine then bolt up a plate to that angled up at the front to form a proper skid plate. Easy to remove/replace. Just thoughts.

Bob
__________________
When The Results Disagree With The Theory: Believe The Results And Invent A New Theory
If I had two brains I,d still be a halfwit

The cave http://s1116.photobucket.com/user/my...deshow/mancave

The build http://www.haynes.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?t=12669
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 26th April 2012, 10:35 PM
rdodger rdodger is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Manchester
Posts: 85
Default

http://westfieldmx5.devocht.com/pictures/the-oil-pan/

I will be modding mine as per the link. It will leave the sump at the same level as the bell housing. The bell housing will sit approx 10mm below the bottom chassis rail.

As I will be fitting an oil cooler I am not worried about the 1/2 litre or so capacity I will lose. If you are you could fit a larger oil filter?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:17 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.