Haynes Forums  

Go Back   Haynes Forums > Haynes Roadster Forums > Chassis
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 18th November 2009, 06:35 PM
flyerncle flyerncle is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: gateshead,near cobbly bit of A1 North
Posts: 3,188
Default

I knew that was coming !!!!!!!!!!
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 18th November 2009, 06:51 PM
georgenewman1 georgenewman1 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 98
Default

i noticed that the roll bar didnt attatch to much, as a result i made the rear hoops of the body support out of 20mm x 3mm seamless tube and braced it down to the diff cage to add extra stiffness
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 18th November 2009, 08:39 PM
mark mark is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Billingham (north east)
Posts: 770
Default

Im using a fibreglass rear end from saturn and this is where i anchored my rear roll bar stays, they are bolted in from underneath with m14 bolts through 6mm support plates plates.

Before anyone says it yes i did put one on the other side aswell
Attached Images
File Type: jpg car pix 043.jpg (58.8 KB, 75 views)
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 18th November 2009, 08:49 PM
georgenewman1 georgenewman1 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 98
Default

how gooder fit are these rear ends. i have a prefabbed aly tank that sits about 1" in from were the skin would sit, willl this contact with the pannel??
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 18th November 2009, 08:52 PM
mark mark is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Billingham (north east)
Posts: 770
Default

Unfortunately you need to modify the rear end a little to make them fit and a book spec fuel tank wouldnt work.

But a few simple mods gets them fitting perfect and they really look the part.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 18th November 2009, 09:14 PM
flyerncle flyerncle is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: gateshead,near cobbly bit of A1 North
Posts: 3,188
Default

Andy is about somewhere and will read this,wouldn't it be sensible to make the rear support tubes to match the rear Saturn/Triton tub,this would make the rear end more structrually sound once again as per the book and offer a little rear end protection also for the fuel tank,can someone enlighten me as to why it was removed other than to fit the Fabby tub.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 18th November 2009, 09:28 PM
HandyAndy's Avatar
HandyAndy HandyAndy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: cleveland
Posts: 3,917
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by flyerncle View Post
Andy is about somewhere and will read this,wouldn't it be sensible to make the rear support tubes to match the rear Saturn/Triton tub,this would make the rear end more structrually sound once again as per the book and offer a little rear end protection also for the fuel tank,can someone enlighten me as to why it was removed other than to fit the Fabby tub.
i may be wrong but the original rear tub tubes were there to support an ali rear tub which isn,t needed for a GRP tub, personally i think that the way Mark has done his rear brace bars offers a stronger anchorage/triangulated point for the roll bar strength.
Then again there is nothing to stop a builder adding some additional 25mm box tubes to create a fuel tank protection cage which could possibly be attached to the diff cage.

andy
ps, in my opinion of course
__________________
Flat Pack Chassis Kits for sale, contact me at andyroadster@yahoo.co.uk

Last edited by HandyAndy : 18th November 2009 at 11:10 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 18th November 2009, 09:31 PM
flyerncle flyerncle is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: gateshead,near cobbly bit of A1 North
Posts: 3,188
Default

I forgot about the mods for the tub
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 19th November 2009, 12:43 PM
mark mark is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Billingham (north east)
Posts: 770
Default

Anyone who has built the rear end to book spec with the round tubes and then chopped it off to fit grp (like i have) will probably agree that the design i have used is a much more sturdy alternative, that coupled with the fact that my rear stays are of a larger diameter and thickness than the book spec should be more than strong enough.

I am in the process of making my tank at the moment and once that is in i may consider some extra protection in that area but im trying not to over engineer things too much as i dont wanna end up at 700kgs on the weighbridge
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 19th November 2009, 04:58 PM
adrianreeve adrianreeve is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 401
Default

Mark

I did exactly the same as you, and my stays go to the same place. Looks good, and after a bit of stress analysis (I used to be a 'proper' engineer) turns out to be a fair bit stronger than original, as stresses are dissipated over a greater area.

Cheers

Adrian
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:28 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.