Haynes Forums  

Go Back   Haynes Forums > Haynes Roadster Forums > General discussion
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 23rd September 2011, 07:49 AM
Greenbeast Greenbeast is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 8
Default Building for efficiency instead of performance

I'm wondering about the Roadster as a platform for an ultra-efficient petrol car or all electric vehicle.

I currently drive a citroen c1 which can do 70mpg+ (extra-urban).
I was wondering about the possibility of putting one of these engines in the roadster to gain even more mpg.

Thoughts anyone??
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 23rd September 2011, 08:18 AM
Talonmotorsport's Avatar
Talonmotorsport Talonmotorsport is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Southminster Essex
Posts: 1,323
Default

I have supplied a few chassis to a training centre who have put 2 very large electric motors running through a type 9 in to a tiger chassis. The only problem is that for every 5 miles of driving you need to carry a 5kg battery which takes 12 hours to charge. Have you considered using a small NA diesel with a turbo? Don't use a turbo diesel just a NA with an added turbo, this means it has smaller injectors so good for economy but burns the fuel more efficiently. You could always get one of those under car mounted speaker sytems so that you can mask the diesel rattle
__________________
Website http://www.talonmotorfabrication.co.uk/

Direct email phil@talonmotorfabrication.co.uk

talonmotorfabrication@gmail.com

Mobile office hours 07514098334
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 23rd September 2011, 08:24 AM
Greenbeast Greenbeast is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 8
Default

I've done a bit of research into the electric side of thing, and i may go that way.

What do you think about the ease of fitting a different, much smaller engine in?
I like my little c1, it's quite perky round town and can handle the motorway with ease, fitting it's engine into something that weighs 2/3 as much should improve acceleration but also overall efficiency, no?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 23rd September 2011, 08:36 AM
twinturbo's Avatar
twinturbo twinturbo is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Carlisle
Posts: 4,389
Default

I would find an efficient Oil Burner, or try LPG + Petrol.

Electric vehicles just shift where the energy is created, it's often created by power stations that waste fuel as they can't produce on demand efficiently. The Batteries cost a lot to make, transport and to dispose of. Add to that the total in-convenience of having to find a charging point and they realy make little sense.

Even a relativly old VW 1.9TD will probably see into 60-70's if driven conservativly in a roadster. You may have to calculate so gearing ratios to keep the engine at it's optimum.

TT
__________________
You only get a woosh with a dump valve

Build Thread


Man Cave Mantiques



Cecil Street Auto Repairs Garage Carlisle




Build Cost £4181.65 - Last - Wheel Cylinders
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 23rd September 2011, 08:41 AM
Greenbeast Greenbeast is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 8
Default

I'm comfortable with the downsides of all-electric, i'm weighing up the options.

Where i'm not sure is the donor engine business. I already see 60-70mpg with my current petrol, surely i must be able to easily beat that in a roadster?
What potential pitfalls might i see using a unusual donor engine/drive train?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 23rd September 2011, 09:24 AM
twinturbo's Avatar
twinturbo twinturbo is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Carlisle
Posts: 4,389
Default

Gearbox is the usual sticking point, otherwise we would have all sorts of tasty engines in frequent use.

And Complex Imobalised Engine management systems.

TT
__________________
You only get a woosh with a dump valve

Build Thread


Man Cave Mantiques



Cecil Street Auto Repairs Garage Carlisle




Build Cost £4181.65 - Last - Wheel Cylinders
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 23rd September 2011, 09:29 AM
Greenbeast Greenbeast is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 8
Default

I'm gonna really show my ignorance here but how come you can't just use the original gearbox?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 23rd September 2011, 09:53 AM
voodoo's Avatar
voodoo voodoo is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Cornwall
Posts: 51
Default

Most modern cars have transverse mounted boxes as they are FWD, the roadster has RWD.

Personally I have been looking at the feasability of running a NA diesel on Biofuel, in addition we are working with a local company that has developed a biodegradable alternative to GRP. Strengthwise it is better, costwise it can't get close.

Matt
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 23rd September 2011, 09:54 AM
AshG's Avatar
AshG AshG is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Rochester
Posts: 1,882
Default

personally i think your wasting your time. the roadster has the aerodynamics of a brick. the best way to gain efficiency is to move the car through the air more efficiently.

typically a 2.0 zetec will do between 35-40mpg in something like a focus. have you ever asked yourself why it still only does 35-40mpg in a 7 which is less than half the weight of a focus?
__________________
My Roadster Is Finished NerNer.......
Pigs can fly, you just have to carry them onto the plane.

My Pictures
http://s707.photobucket.com/user/ashgardiner/profile/
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 23rd September 2011, 10:22 AM
Greenbeast Greenbeast is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 8
Default

Voodoo, thanks for that, knew it'd be something obvious.

Ash, good point
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:32 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.