Haynes Forums  

Go Back   Haynes Forums > Haynes Roadster Forums > Engine/transmission
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 16th March 2009, 10:16 PM
tr7v8 tr7v8 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 5
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris Gibbs View Post
Did I say that?

No, the chassis should be ok for the Rover engine.

The bit about the pinto and the Rover V8 being the same weight is a bit of an urban myth, probably the fault of the internet.

The rover block weighs a little less than a pinto engine, which means that the dressed V8 is 25kg or so heavier than the pinto. It's still a light engine for it's power.

The V8 gets lighter and the pinto gets heavier everytime I hear this yarn, to the point that someone told me that the Rover engine was "about two thirds of the weight of a pinto" yes it's got a lighter block but a huge crankshaft, 8 pistons and 8 con rods do weigh something!

Cheers

Chris
The Rover uses thin wall casting technologies so is light even for an all alloy engine. A quick google gives the Rover at 320Lb & the Pinto at between 370-400Lb.
If you dump the CI manifolds on both which you would do for a kit then the difference is is significant.
The lumpy bit of the V8 is the flywheel which mine had 3kG hacked off of & probably could have lost more.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 16th March 2009, 11:12 PM
NigelC NigelC is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1
Default

Hi

I think the V8 is a great idea.

I am going down the track of using a Rover V8 as well. It was suggested to me that perhaps I should use 50x25x1.6 for the top and bottom rails as this will add significant strength to the chassis, and give a little more height to fit the V8 into. In New Zealand we have to go through a low volume vehicle certification process, and the certifiers are generally very helpful and provide little gems like this.

Go for the V8

Cheers
Nigel
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 17th March 2009, 05:58 PM
fabbyglass
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Might pay to up the gauge of the lower rails as well perhaps to 14swg?
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 17th March 2009, 07:21 PM
shadowcaster shadowcaster is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: St Erme Cornwall
Posts: 345
Default

I was thinking it would be a good idea to add a bit of extra strength in those areas.
__________________
Cheers Rich

It does not matter how slowly you go so long as you do not stop.
Confucius Chinese philosopher & reformer (551 BC - 479 BC)
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 17th March 2009, 08:43 PM
flyerncle flyerncle is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: gateshead,near cobbly bit of A1 North
Posts: 3,188
Default

Input from the boss might be helpfull if you are adding metal here and there or am I in for more flack Mr G ?

After all I would think it was CAD drawn and all stresses etc worked out with good margin for the "Human factor" built in.

Just a thought....
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 18th March 2009, 10:08 PM
snapper snapper is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Chelmsford, Essex
Posts: 360
Default

You may need bigger wheels or a taller diff to make use of the lower revs but higher torque
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 10th July 2009, 03:20 PM
V8 Roadster V8 Roadster is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Midlands
Posts: 2
Default

The rover V8 fits a treat! as for weight the heads and block are aluminium most of the serious weight is in the crank and gearbox giving a low centre of gravity!
To fit the engine with rover manual sd1 gearbox the top bulkhead box section needs to be moved back approx 1 1/2", the vertical box section on the drivers side is moved in again approx 1 1/2" this nescessitates altering the angle of the bend of the lower rail (box section) on this side. This still leaves ample room for a pedal box to be made up.
The reason for moving the engine back is to provide clearance for steering shaft to steering rack, also you will need to fit a Seirra Cosworth 2wd (short) oil filter which is a direct fitment to the rover v8.
This should also improve handling, with this set up i have got a good 4" ground clearence from the sump.
Drivetrain wise i have used the Cosworth 2wd 7 1/2" diff, drive shafts and hubs for use of rear discs.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 10th July 2009, 08:39 PM
Jimbob Jimbob is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 15
Default

Hi Shadowcaster. I'm in the process of fitting an RV8 to mine..

It might be a little heavier sure... But not much, at least the blockis short and will sit back.

The worst that will happen is that you'll end up with nearly 200 torquey hp and an awsome sound. (with two exhausts!)


Come on man, what are you waiting for?
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 11th July 2009, 08:22 AM
mr henderson mr henderson is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Aylesbury
Posts: 364
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MikeB View Post
Go for it, I wouldn't put an old auto box in though, I would almost guarantee you'll love the dropping a cog to overtake and the ability to hold the power round the corners etc.
Auto boxes can change down too!

AFAIAC there is only one problem with the auto boxes easily available for RV8s is that they don't usually have an overdrive gear. The four speed boxes fitted to later Range Rovers are no good for us because of the 4WD transfer box that is incorporated.

So, if anyone fancies an auto box on an RV8 then they will want to go for the tallest ratio diff they can get.

The later SD1 auto box is the one to go for, drive that gently in top, then when you want to overtake, just boot it. The box will sense the drop in vacuum and change down (very quickly) and the results will be very acceptable
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 11th July 2009, 11:49 AM
fabbyglass
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Can't beat a bit of gear stirring by hand though...
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:18 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.