View Full Version : Finite Element Analysis of Sevenesque Style Chassis
eSteve
27th October 2010, 06:41 AM
Morning,
found some reports on FEA of some Sevenesque style chassis whilest stumbling about the Internet. They are on the Locost7 info site's in the chassis section:
www.Locost7.info (http://www.locost7.info/mirror/chassis.php)
On this page see the links to (they will open the documents in Word):
Final Thesis A.doc (http://www.locost7.info/files/chassis/Final_Thesis_A.doc)
Final Thesis B.doc (http://www.locost7.info/files/chassis/Final_Thesis_B.doc)
by Wesley Linton (MSC Thesis - Cranfield University)
kitcaranalysis.doc (http://www.locost7.info/files/chassis/kitcaranalysis.doc)
kitcaranalysis_V2.doc (http://www.locost7.info/files/chassis/kitcaranalysis_V2.doc)
by Unknown
Both deal with Sevenesque style chassis carrying out some FEA work on improving their stiffness. The work by Linton deals with a Leugo chassis and some work was carried out to align the model with experimental data. The other work is based on a Locost chassis.
They both make interesting reading.
K4KEV
27th October 2010, 09:49 AM
This is HEAVEEEEEEEEEEEEe
ALRMALARM BRAIN CELL OVERLOAD.....ALRMALARM BRAIN CELL OVERLOAD.....ALRMALARM BRAIN CELL OVERLOAD.....ALRMALARM BRAIN CELL OVERLOAD.....ALRMALARM BRAIN CELL OVERLOAD:D :D :D
TQ_uk
27th October 2010, 11:44 AM
Over on Locost Builders someone did some FEA & came up with a few simple mods that would be beneficial to the overall design - busy at mo but will see if I can dig around later
spud69
27th October 2010, 12:02 PM
I agree with Kev, far too heavy for me.
The best mod i can see is to consider making the chassis from 2mm wall section box rather than the 1.6mm. Doesn't seem like a lot, extra 8kg, but it makes the chassis a lot stiffer and stronger. Add some additional cross bracing around the engine bay and you have a very stiff chassis.
Just my thoughts.....AndyH
TQ_uk
27th October 2010, 12:17 PM
Ah, should have viewed your links first - the link to 'kitcaranalysys_V2.doc' is what I was referring to...
HandyAndy
27th October 2010, 08:35 PM
I,ve just started reading the attached links, maybe I,m the odd one out:o but that is quite interesting reading :)
I,ve saved it & will be reading it in more depth later....when kids are not wanting my attention :rolleyes:
cheers
andy
les g
27th October 2010, 11:18 PM
I,ve just started reading the attached links, maybe I,m the odd one out:o but that is quite interesting reading :)
I,ve saved it & will be reading it in more depth later....when kids are not wanting my attention :rolleyes:
cheers
andy
and then would you please design a chassis where the coilovers are in a better plane ie:front to back and with bellcranks and pushrods
cheers les g
HandyAndy
27th October 2010, 11:26 PM
and then would you please design a chassis where the coilovers are in a better plane ie:front to back and with bellcranks and pushrods
cheers les g
:D
maybe i need to get out more , but the chassis "work" I find interesting:o :)
cheers
andy
flyerncle
28th October 2010, 08:10 PM
Go to 3GE 's website Les,copy the chassis pic and and make it larger you will see the brackets for the rocker arms fitted to it.
shh120m
28th October 2010, 08:18 PM
I agree with Kev, far too heavy for me.
The best mod i can see is to consider making the chassis from 2mm wall section box rather than the 1.6mm. Doesn't seem like a lot, extra 8kg, but it makes the chassis a lot stiffer and stronger. Add some additional cross bracing around the engine bay and you have a very stiff chassis.
Just my thoughts.....AndyH
I made my chassis from 2mm wall steel just because thats all i could get hold of at the time, but i bought a 2m section of 1.6mm box from b&Q the other day for the grp rear tub frame and in all honesty the thickness of the wall scared me, makes me feel glad iv over engineered things. i also blew a hole through it when welding!, i think 2mm is a little more forgiving to the novice welder like me, may be worth noting for those with limited welding experience looking to build a roadster in the future.
vBulletin® v3.6.4, Copyright ©2000-2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.