robo
16th December 2011, 05:06 PM
Some facts on the seven type aerodynamics form wiki
High-speed lift
The CSR, as with all Caterhams, has worse performance at higher speeds with respect to both acceleration and handling because of the poor aerodynamics. Caterhams suffer not only from a high drag coefficient of 0.7, but also from lift.[9] Though there have been improvements in aerodynamics, the CSR still has 50 pounds of lift at 100 mph (160 km/h).[1][10] These factors hinder both high-end acceleration, top speed, and handling. With such strong wind resistance, it requires much more power to overcome that force and increase top speed. Lift reduces contact force on the tires, causing the car to feel "loose" and not handle as well. For comparison, the Ferrari Enzo has a low drag coefficient of 0.32 and actually creates 1,709 lb (775 kg) of downforce at 186 mph (299 km/h).[11]
Should a small front wing not be developed to keep the front planted? That must be scary in a bec.
Bob
High-speed lift
The CSR, as with all Caterhams, has worse performance at higher speeds with respect to both acceleration and handling because of the poor aerodynamics. Caterhams suffer not only from a high drag coefficient of 0.7, but also from lift.[9] Though there have been improvements in aerodynamics, the CSR still has 50 pounds of lift at 100 mph (160 km/h).[1][10] These factors hinder both high-end acceleration, top speed, and handling. With such strong wind resistance, it requires much more power to overcome that force and increase top speed. Lift reduces contact force on the tires, causing the car to feel "loose" and not handle as well. For comparison, the Ferrari Enzo has a low drag coefficient of 0.32 and actually creates 1,709 lb (775 kg) of downforce at 186 mph (299 km/h).[11]
Should a small front wing not be developed to keep the front planted? That must be scary in a bec.
Bob