![]() |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Less is more...
![]() |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Yeah, they're both aftermarket engine management systems intended to replace your original ECU.
The benefit is that they allow you to completely mess up, erm I mean tune, your spark and fuel ![]() Unless you're going to make heavy engine mods, go forced induction, or just like to spend endless hours tapping numbers into a lap top I wouldn't bother! Saying that, I probably will replace my OEM ECU post-IVA, but mainly because I'm a bit of a masochist and like playing around with electrickery ![]() |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
![]()
__________________
When The Results Disagree With The Theory: Believe The Results And Invent A New Theory If I had two brains I,d still be a halfwit The cave http://s1116.photobucket.com/user/my...deshow/mancave The build http://www.haynes.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?t=12669 |
#14
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
My old Subaru Impreza WRX (as my avatar) had some fancy fuel management system and was pumping out around 350BHP, it had a "Dual map " setup where i could use on one setting for "Road" ![]() ![]() Could something like this be implemented into one of these Fuel management systems that have been mentioned. Would probably only realy be worthwhile if the motor was turbo'd ![]()
__________________
"There are no secrets to success. It is the result of preparation, hard work, and learning from failure." "The road to success is always under construction" ![]() ![]() Photo Albums Build Thread Donor: 1.6 Jap import MX-5 Chassis: Based upon Saturn MX-5 guide Official start date: TBC Build cost to date: £400 profit from donor sales ![]() |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Would almost be worth grabbing an engine from something else in the mx5 line up.Model
MX-5 (mk1) MX-5 1.8i (mk2) MX-5 1.8i (mk2 rev) MX-5 Turbo (mk2 rev) Year of production 1989-97 1998-2000 2000-05 2004-05 No. produced 720,407 units (mk1+mk2) 720,407 units (mk1+mk2) 720,407 units (mk1+mk2) 720,407 units (mk1+mk2) Layout Front-engined, Rwd Front-engined, Rwd Front-engined, Rwd Front-engined, Rwd L / W / H / WB (mm) 3950 / 1675 / 1230 / 2265 3945 / 1675 / 1230 / 2265 3955 / 1680 / 1235 / 2265 3965 / 1680 / 1228 / 2265 Engine Inline-4, dohc, 4v/cyl Inline-4, dohc, 4v/cyl, variable intake manifolds Inline-4, dohc, 4v/cyl, VVT Inline-4, dohc, 4v/cyl, turbo Capacity 1598 cc 1839 cc 1839 cc 1839 cc Power 115 hp 140 hp 146 hp (160hp for Japan) 178 hp (SAE) / 172 hp (JIS) Torque 100 lbft 119 lbft 124 lbft 166 lbft (SAE) / 154 lbft (JIS) Gearbox 5M 6M 6M 6M Tires 185/60HR14 195/50VR15 205/45WR16 205/40WR17 Weight 955 kg 1030 kg 1100 kg 1120 kg Top speed 114 mph* 126 mph* 125 mph* 132 mph (est) 0-60 mph 9.1 sec* 7.8 sec* 8.2 sec* 6.7 sec** 0-100 mph 27.7 sec* 22.5 sec* 24.2 sec* 18.3 sec** Some of the other lumps are no disgrace. Bob
__________________
When The Results Disagree With The Theory: Believe The Results And Invent A New Theory If I had two brains I,d still be a halfwit The cave http://s1116.photobucket.com/user/my...deshow/mancave The build http://www.haynes.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?t=12669 |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|