Haynes Forums  

Go Back   Haynes Forums > Haynes Roadster Forums > Chassis
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 19th February 2012, 08:35 PM
Shorty Shorty is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: South shields
Posts: 166
Default Transmission tunnel type 9 or mt75?

Hi, just planning ahead at the moment but hoping to start chassis soon and I am wondering if there is much difference between the two and is there any drawbacks of either?
I was planning on sticking with the type 9 as I wanted to keep to the book as much as possible for simplicity for my first build but did want to use a zetec rather than pinto as they are getting very scarce.
I understand that the mt75 is slightly bigger, so just wondering if it is best to make the chassis to accept the larger gearbox then you would have the option of fitting either box?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 20th February 2012, 03:08 AM
ozzy1's Avatar
ozzy1 ozzy1 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: perth,australia
Posts: 760
Default

I would think if you are likely to fit an mt75 in the future then build it to suit now.
Here is a link to the mt75 chassis drawings so you can compare the difference in size.

http://www.haynes.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?t=2430
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 20th February 2012, 07:06 AM
skov's Avatar
skov skov is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,085
Default

Welcome to the forum!

The only downside of the MT75 version I can think of is that you lose a bit of width from the (already cramped!) footwells.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 20th February 2012, 02:13 PM
Shorty Shorty is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: South shields
Posts: 166
Default

Good info, thanks.
Will have to consider those points before I order steel.
Skov- I see you are using mx5 engine/gearbox with slight mod to rear end from book spec, good to know that there are other options available without needing huge amounts of adjustment.
Is there any other engine/gearbox options that would fit into the basic chassis without serious alteration?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 23rd February 2012, 08:58 PM
Shorty Shorty is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: South shields
Posts: 166
Default

Think I will just stick with zetec/type 9 as this seems very popular option.
Is there anything that needs altering to the chassis to fit this engine?
I read somewhere that one of the rails needs moving slightly to clear water pump... cant seem to find that post.
Just want to make sure I have a list of any amendments that will be needed from book spec before I start on the chassis
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 25th February 2012, 03:48 PM
baz-r baz-r is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,464
Default

the tr tube at the back of the engine needs to be steped back by 25-30mm in the middleabove the bell housing to get the std thermostat housing in at the back of the cyl head.
a simple way of doing this is to make the chassis as book then at the bit before you cut the bit out of the bottom rail for the bell housing tack (20mm welds) at the ends a section of 25mm box behind the top rail between the frontof the trans tunnel 19mm tubes then cut out the middle of the orignal with 45 deg cuts so the orignal is stepped back
i added 3mm packers in mine to get 28mm offset as it looked like i needed a bit more but 25mm would have been ok.
i hope you can get your head around my discription
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:29 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.