Haynes Forums  

Go Back   Haynes Forums > Haynes Roadster Forums > Engine/transmission
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 12th May 2013, 07:15 PM
voucht's Avatar
voucht voucht is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Lautrec, Tarn (81), Occitanie, France
Posts: 879
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by flyerncle View Post
Possibley too late but I placed the mounting plates where the rubbers go on the chassis legs, and the angle of the load is more acceptable instead of being 90 deg/ vertical on the plate close to the engine.
Thank you Paul.
Yes, I know. The best thing would have been to do a custom engine mount as described in the book (alternative engine mounts), without using the boxes made with the "EM plates". I totally agree that angled legs would have been better. But I made the "boxes" and they are fully welded to the chassis, because I didn't expect I would have clearance issues between the water outlet and the steering column. I really didn't want to remove them, that is the reason why I "copied" the original cast mounts, and just adjust the height to solve the clearance problem.

The engine mounts are now finished. They look like that.

CustomEngineMounts04.jpg

I braced the right one with triangular plates on top. The bottom plate (6mm) is fully welded on the full length of the tubes making the "skeleton" of the mount.

CustomEngineMounts05.jpg

No bracing on the right mounts, but two plates, fully welded to the tubes, on top and at the bottom.

CustomEngineMounts06.jpg
CustomEngineMounts07.jpg

I hope they are going to be strong enough. To me, they do look strong enough, but again, I'm not a specialist. What do you guys think of the final mounts?

Any comment is still welcome.

Thanks a lot.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 13th May 2013, 07:52 PM
flyerncle flyerncle is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: gateshead,near cobbly bit of A1 North
Posts: 3,188
Default

I thought it would be too late but was worth comment I thought,I have one box and one on the chassis on my frame more by bad management than forethought.

your latest versions look tough enough so would not worry.

Look at the mass of the ally ones and think of the amount of metal used to hold up the motor just because its alloy,so yours should have no problem.
__________________
Cost : Little as possible.
Thanks : To those who by their generosity my build has progressed.
Its a handmade sports car not a flaming kit car !!!


If at first you dont succeed,avoid skydiving...

No parachute require to freefall,only if you want to do it twice.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 13th May 2013, 10:16 PM
voucht's Avatar
voucht voucht is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Lautrec, Tarn (81), Occitanie, France
Posts: 879
Default

Thank you for that, very helpful and reassuring. Hope I will sleep better this night than last night

I agree with you on comparing the amount of metal with the original ones.

Now I just hope it is going to be OK for the SFRO (Swedish IVA) inspector too!

Thanks again.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 13th May 2013, 10:33 PM
flyerncle flyerncle is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: gateshead,near cobbly bit of A1 North
Posts: 3,188
Default

I hope so too,over engineered is always better to me.

Good luck.
__________________
Cost : Little as possible.
Thanks : To those who by their generosity my build has progressed.
Its a handmade sports car not a flaming kit car !!!


If at first you dont succeed,avoid skydiving...

No parachute require to freefall,only if you want to do it twice.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:38 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.