Haynes Forums  

Go Back   Haynes Forums > Haynes Roadster Forums > General discussion
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 25th March 2012, 10:25 PM
Eternal Eternal is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Bournemouth, Dorset
Posts: 599
Default

...and a well setup Roadster will run rings around a standard locost.

All depends on time and cash.
__________________
Build Cost: .............. lost count a while back.

Skyline Roadster
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 25th March 2012, 10:29 PM
MarkB MarkB is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: naughty step most of the time
Posts: 494
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Eternal View Post
...and a well setup Roadster will run rings around a standard locost.

All depends on time and cash.
Sooner a speed boat than a barge
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 26th March 2012, 08:10 AM
robo robo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: scabs
Posts: 1,722
Default

Best we tell all the race teams in the world + F1+ the car companies that they are all wrong and to put live axles back in the cars cos they are bestest


Bob
__________________
When The Results Disagree With The Theory: Believe The Results And Invent A New Theory
If I had two brains I,d still be a halfwit

The cave http://s1116.photobucket.com/user/my...deshow/mancave

The build http://www.haynes.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?t=12669
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 26th March 2012, 08:52 AM
MarkB MarkB is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: naughty step most of the time
Posts: 494
Default

Doesn't matter how the drive is transferred to the road, whether a live axle, IRS or Dedion.
The important bit is geometry so it actually works.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 26th March 2012, 10:42 AM
robo robo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: scabs
Posts: 1,722
Default

Cant accept that you can have something as heavy as an axle which weighs as much as the back end of the car as unsprung weight. All ok on a billiard table race track but show the car some shite roads and it will skip about all over the place. I have driven both and thats exactly what the live axle does, its just not compliant over potholes etc.

Bob
__________________
When The Results Disagree With The Theory: Believe The Results And Invent A New Theory
If I had two brains I,d still be a halfwit

The cave http://s1116.photobucket.com/user/my...deshow/mancave

The build http://www.haynes.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?t=12669
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 26th March 2012, 11:55 AM
MikeB MikeB is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Nr Wellingborough
Posts: 512
Default

not much between an independant and a de dion (caterham). Live axle ok for track use.
As mark says though the geometry has to be right.
I haven't seen any graphs of the camber gain vs deflection for the haynes.
The rear is the easiest to get right, it's lot harder to get the front right especially with the constraints of the front uprights.

For me it will be about on road fun with the odd track day, it should be a laugh what ever, as long as I have enough power to pop the back out for a bit of controllable fun I'll be happy!

If I'm unhappy down the line I'll look at changes to the geometry.

to the OP, i'm sure there are many locosts running with independant rear ends. That way you'd get the best of both
__________________
Build Cost so far £xxx (Given up adding it up) - She Starts!! Build Thread Here:
http://www.haynes.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?t=5501
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 27th March 2012, 11:53 AM
BackyardRacing BackyardRacing is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: bolton
Posts: 5
Default

Thanks for the input so far guys

To add to the debate, what's people's thoughts on the mx5 based roadster vs the sierra based roadster?

Are the mx5 components lighter? I know the Mazda
Engine is somewhat more powerful than those stone age pinto's.

But, I take it the mx5 route is more expensive and complicated?
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 27th March 2012, 01:14 PM
skov's Avatar
skov skov is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,085
Default

The wiring is probably more complicated if you take the MX5 route.
The rest isn't any harder, and in some ways it's easier as you don't need to make new rear uprights, or add those mushroom things to the front ones.

Not sure it's any more expensive either. The donor might cost you slightly more than a Sierra but MX5 parts are still in demand and you can cover the cost of the donor (and even make a small profit) selling the bits you don't use.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 27th March 2012, 01:38 PM
brainbug007's Avatar
brainbug007 brainbug007 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Weston-Super-Mare
Posts: 846
Default

I'm not sure the wiring is any worse with the mx5 compared to the sierra. I've removed at least 2-3 bin bags of wire from the sierra loom that was either redunant or just too long and had to be shortened.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 27th March 2012, 03:57 PM
robo robo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: scabs
Posts: 1,722
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by brainbug007 View Post
I'm not sure the wiring is any worse with the mx5 compared to the sierra. I've removed at least 2-3 bin bags of wire from the sierra loom that was either redunant or just too long and had to be shortened.
We know that

Bob
__________________
When The Results Disagree With The Theory: Believe The Results And Invent A New Theory
If I had two brains I,d still be a halfwit

The cave http://s1116.photobucket.com/user/my...deshow/mancave

The build http://www.haynes.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?t=12669
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:50 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.