Haynes Forums  

Go Back   Haynes Forums > Haynes Roadster Forums > Off subject
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 28th August 2012, 09:07 PM
baz-r baz-r is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,464
Default

all the sierra base kits of the cobra are not realy ideal for bunging in a massive lumps in and as a side effect are not desired realy think of them as designd to be sheep in wolfs clothing not vise versa

also good cobra reps are well known to be time and money pits
im suprised no one has made somthing like a thruxton gt version of a cobra going down the old shape moden take rule of thinking
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 28th August 2012, 09:22 PM
michael92 michael92 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: boston lincolnshire
Posts: 322
Default

I am personally noy a fan of hawk, I would say Gd or mainly AK ring and book a factory tour /test drive with AK or Gd im sure youll be happily suprised
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 29th August 2012, 11:46 AM
Not Anumber Not Anumber is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Southend on Sea. UK
Posts: 243
Default

I have experience of dealing with Hawk, Ram and Pilgrim back in the day.

I built a Hawk 6, basically Hawk's Cobra chassis but with AC ACE rather than AC Cobra bodywork (narrower arches) and used modified TR6 running gear. Like most kit manufacturers there wasnt much by way of printed build instructions but Gerry Hawkridge usually returned calls quickly. I built it as a joint project with a work colleague and got the mechanicals finished off by Adrian Cocking of Ram Automotive as they were well reccommended in cobra circles and were based near where i was working. Adrian was amazingly knowledgeable and helpful. It felt like an old British sports car to drive just a lot faster and with very secure handling.

I bought an already built Pilgrim Sumo Cobra replica. This car wasn't great, it didnt handle- Pilgrim said it needed harder, shorter springs which i fitted and made it rather worse. The prop shaft ran at an absurd angle due to the offset position of the diff on the IRS (Mk2 Granada; this caused it to keep breaking prop UJs and it ate a gearbox by putting too much sideways pressure on the output shaft. Pilgrim said it was unfortunate but hard to avoid, blaming the design of the donor IRS (so why did they use it). Having said that i drove it a year in all weathers for daily commuting and not much else broke. The 2.8 carb engine it came with gave average performance and the car handled so poorly that for once i didnt want any more power. The guy I sold it to unfortunately managed to roll it over within a week of buying it breaking several bones and leaving the car as a badly distorted chassis and a pile of fibreglass bits. The guys at Pilgrim were ok to deal with but didnt like any criticism of their design which i guess was understandable.
This was in the days before Internet forums so kit makers could often get away with major flaws so long as they kept on the right side of the magazine journalists and weren't blatantly selling downright death traps. From what i have heard the later Sierra based ones Sumos handled an awful lot better and kept on getting better in stages with plenty of people fitting small block Ford V8s.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:06 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.