#21
|
|||
|
|||
I knew that was coming !!!!!!!!!!
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
i noticed that the roll bar didnt attatch to much, as a result i made the rear hoops of the body support out of 20mm x 3mm seamless tube and braced it down to the diff cage to add extra stiffness
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Im using a fibreglass rear end from saturn and this is where i anchored my rear roll bar stays, they are bolted in from underneath with m14 bolts through 6mm support plates plates.
Before anyone says it yes i did put one on the other side aswell |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
how gooder fit are these rear ends. i have a prefabbed aly tank that sits about 1" in from were the skin would sit, willl this contact with the pannel??
|
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Unfortunately you need to modify the rear end a little to make them fit and a book spec fuel tank wouldnt work.
But a few simple mods gets them fitting perfect and they really look the part. |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Andy is about somewhere and will read this,wouldn't it be sensible to make the rear support tubes to match the rear Saturn/Triton tub,this would make the rear end more structrually sound once again as per the book and offer a little rear end protection also for the fuel tank,can someone enlighten me as to why it was removed other than to fit the Fabby tub.
|
#27
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Then again there is nothing to stop a builder adding some additional 25mm box tubes to create a fuel tank protection cage which could possibly be attached to the diff cage. andy ps, in my opinion of course
__________________
Flat Pack Chassis Kits for sale, contact me at andyroadster@yahoo.co.uk Last edited by HandyAndy : 18th November 2009 at 11:10 PM. |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
I forgot about the mods for the tub
|
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Anyone who has built the rear end to book spec with the round tubes and then chopped it off to fit grp (like i have) will probably agree that the design i have used is a much more sturdy alternative, that coupled with the fact that my rear stays are of a larger diameter and thickness than the book spec should be more than strong enough.
I am in the process of making my tank at the moment and once that is in i may consider some extra protection in that area but im trying not to over engineer things too much as i dont wanna end up at 700kgs on the weighbridge |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Mark
I did exactly the same as you, and my stays go to the same place. Looks good, and after a bit of stress analysis (I used to be a 'proper' engineer) turns out to be a fair bit stronger than original, as stresses are dissipated over a greater area. Cheers Adrian |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|