Haynes Forums  

Go Back   Haynes Forums > Haynes Roadster Forums > General discussion
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #41  
Old 21st May 2009, 11:35 PM
AshG's Avatar
AshG AshG is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Rochester
Posts: 1,882
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HandyAndy View Post
Ash, did you type that long thread or pasted it????
how,s the build?
andy

i typed it out for another forum ages ago but saved it in notepad as i knew it would be usefull one day.

cracking on got the rad today so that will be going on this weekend. i have got about 10 jobs left on the list to do before i can sand blast and paint the chassis. then its on to floor and body pannels, pipes and wires, fuel tank, running gear, engine..............sod it i can't be bothered to type any more.
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 22nd May 2009, 12:00 AM
davidimurray's Avatar
davidimurray davidimurray is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Near Cardiff
Posts: 742
Default

Generally - RHS (Rolled Hollow Section) is considered as a structural steel and as such will be less less strict tolerances then ERW (Electric Resistance Welded) or CDS (Cold Drawn Seamless). RHS will normally come in the 'black' form straight out of the mill whereas the others are likely to have been cold rolled and/or pickled to get rid of the scale. For our applications, the existance of the weld does not really make any difference. Typically ERW is so good nowadays that if you cut the tube and look at the weld under a microscope it is very difficult to distinguish the difference between the weld and the parent metal. Where you often will find differences will be when it comes to using these 'hollow' sections for pressurised pipework - as ERW ahs a lower 'joint' factor than CDS which reduces the overall pressure rating of the pipe - guess what I've been doing at work recently Interestingly, I did some work comparing the cost of ERW and CDS for a job at work and found there was no clear difference between the two, for some stuff one was cheaper than the other and for others the reverse applied. One other thing to bear in mind when ordering is that the tube is typically supplied in 'random' lengths - these are between 5.7m and 6.1m - it is easy to get caught out by this and assume they are 6m lenghts - been there done that

Cheers

Dave
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 22nd May 2009, 12:03 AM
davidimurray's Avatar
davidimurray davidimurray is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Near Cardiff
Posts: 742
Default

Quote:
What's the difference between Tube and Pipe?
The general term for pipe was that it was primarily used for carrying gas or liquid. It was not intended for structural use because the dimensions used in describing pipe was not dimensionally accurate. Measurement was referred to its inside diameter and wall thickness. The inside diameter was a true dimension, but over the years had become "nominal" (in name only) so that when pipe size was referred to, it was an approximate inside diameter measurement with the thickness described by the term "schedule".
Interestingly, or maybe not, Our Euro/British standard friends seem to have now standardised on the term Tube for any fluid/gas conveyance tubing!
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 22nd May 2009, 01:18 AM
Land Locked's Avatar
Land Locked Land Locked is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Johannesburg, Sarf Efrika
Posts: 232
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AshG View Post
Handy little snippet if you fancy a read.



Cold formed....(Edited to save space)....measurement with the thickness described by the term "schedule".
Thanks for a very very useful post, now I know what I'm looking for.

Last edited by Land Locked : 22nd May 2009 at 07:41 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 22nd May 2009, 07:45 AM
Land Locked's Avatar
Land Locked Land Locked is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Johannesburg, Sarf Efrika
Posts: 232
Wink

The other welding question.

It would appear that the Sarf Efriken sevenesque people look with disdain on any form of welding except TIG. To them TIG is the the holy grail AND the only remotely acceptable way to weld a chassis. Yes TIG makes very pretty welds, but do we need to be that anally retentive?
Reply With Quote
  #46  
Old 22nd May 2009, 07:50 AM
Tatey's Avatar
Tatey Tatey is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Leicester
Posts: 827
Default

I dont think we do need to be that analy retentive. As if you're welding properly then the material should break before the weld does.
Reply With Quote
  #47  
Old 22nd May 2009, 09:33 AM
AshG's Avatar
AshG AshG is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Rochester
Posts: 1,882
Default

i started of with the mig on my chassis then wnet to tig then back to mig as the tig was to slow for someone impatient like me.

i only crack the tig out for little jobs like closing up the ends of the chsaais tubes these days. oh and it will come out again to do the ali fuel tank.
Reply With Quote
  #48  
Old 22nd May 2009, 10:24 AM
RAYLEE29's Avatar
RAYLEE29 RAYLEE29 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: POOLE DORSET
Posts: 520
Default

Hi, just a thought,
is it true that tig produces a more brittle weld than mig because of the intesity and concetration of tig welding?
I was told this by a fabricator years ago.
Ray
Reply With Quote
  #49  
Old 22nd May 2009, 10:30 AM
fabbyglass
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Done properly it's better as you can control the heat you are putting in as well as the filler rod, where mig is more brutal but then hairy chickens legs against bald mole legs
Reply With Quote
  #50  
Old 22nd May 2009, 10:40 AM
RAYLEE29's Avatar
RAYLEE29 RAYLEE29 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: POOLE DORSET
Posts: 520
Default

I would have used my tig for some of it but couldnt justify the argon bottle hire price and i get my co2 for a £1 a kilo.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:09 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.