Haynes Forums  

Go Back   Haynes Forums > Haynes Roadster Forums > Donor cars
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10th May 2009, 09:38 AM
DaveW DaveW is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 4
Default Best Donor car for a haynes 4x4 4wd car

Can you help on this one

Best Donor car for a haynes 4x4 4wd car

Best regards David
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10th May 2009, 09:57 AM
Bonzo's Avatar
Bonzo Bonzo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Cornwall
Posts: 3,321
Default

That would be a hard one to do.

A 4X4 would require a complete re-design of most of the front end.

The Sierra XR4 would seem an obvious choice although i don't think you will overcome the sump clearance issue.

That would leave the Subaru & Audi options
__________________
I am not a complete idiot...........Some of the parts are missing !!
Ronnie

www.roadster-builders.co.uk
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10th May 2009, 09:57 AM
aaronbassett aaronbassett is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: kent
Posts: 62
Default

sierria 4x4 if you can make every thing fit
__________________
my blog


Building is just another word for progress
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10th May 2009, 01:44 PM
Chris Gibbs
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Google "Dax Quadra", this was a Sierra 4 x 4 based car.

The problem with the system is that the transfer box on the gearbox for the front prop/differential is on the drivers side of the gearbox and therefore takes up space in the drivers footwell.

There's also a 4 x 4 Locost, try a search on the Locostbuilders forum.

Cheers

Chris
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10th May 2009, 05:59 PM
AshG's Avatar
AshG AshG is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Rochester
Posts: 1,882
Default

my question to all is why would you want a 4x4 roadster?

im building a roadster because i wanted a small fast rwd car. why? because they are more fun that way!

i dont think its impossible to do and i would be very interested to see how someone goes about it. i just can't see the major advantage on such a small light car compared to all the extra weight and the time/effort put into developing it.

you never know one day they may start off roading roadsters then it will be a great idea
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10th May 2009, 08:29 PM
fabbyglass
 
Posts: n/a
Default

RWD much better and a lot more fun especially in the wet

I have my own section of "hillclimb" on the way to grp suppliers so drive it like a complete knob but boy is it fun and a damn fine way of relieving stress..I arrive with a smile everytime
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10th May 2009, 09:34 PM
Bonzo's Avatar
Bonzo Bonzo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Cornwall
Posts: 3,321
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fabbyglass View Post
RWD much better and a lot more fun especially in the wet

I have my own section of "hillclimb" on the way to grp suppliers so drive it like a complete knob but boy is it fun and a damn fine way of relieving stress..I arrive with a smile everytime

A lovely bit of road Mark

Lets hope we never meet when I am driving like a bell end
__________________
I am not a complete idiot...........Some of the parts are missing !!
Ronnie

www.roadster-builders.co.uk
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11th May 2009, 12:56 PM
DaveW DaveW is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 4
Wink

Quote:
Originally Posted by AshG View Post
my question to all is why would you want a 4x4 roadster?

im building a roadster because i wanted a small fast rwd car. why? because they are more fun that way!

i dont think its impossible to do and i would be very interested to see how someone goes about it. i just can't see the major advantage on such a small light car compared to all the extra weight and the time/effort put into developing it.

you never know one day they may start off roading roadsters then it will be a great idea
200 km daily to my Works
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 4th November 2009, 09:21 PM
chrisunwin chrisunwin is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Stubbington
Posts: 16
Default

Dave

I have pondered the 4X4 option, the only way I can see to do it is to use the engine and box from a front wheel drive car, turn the whole lot through 90deg, then mate the drive shafts to dfis front and rear. BIG problem is that the diffs will need a 1 to 1 ratio. Good luck finding them.

Regards

Chris
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 4th November 2009, 09:26 PM
londonsean69 londonsean69 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Surrey/South London Border
Posts: 453
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chrisunwin View Post
Dave

I have pondered the 4X4 option, the only way I can see to do it is to use the engine and box from a front wheel drive car, turn the whole lot through 90deg, then mate the drive shafts to dfis front and rear. BIG problem is that the diffs will need a 1 to 1 ratio. Good luck finding them.

Regards

Chris
You have confused the hell out of me there. Why would you need a second gearbox? Just use 4x4 running gear from, oh lets see, a Sierra 4x4??

I asked this question some time ago on the LB forum, and whilst it can be done (and has been - although not a Haynes) it is a lot of work, involving inboard shocks to avoid front driveshafts etc.

Link to LB discussion on 4x4 locost/haynes
__________________
Sean
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:20 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.