Haynes Forums  

Go Back   Haynes Forums > Haynes Roadster Forums > Bodywork and interior
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 17th September 2012, 07:16 PM
Ben_Copeland's Avatar
Ben_Copeland Ben_Copeland is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 290
Default Sneak Peak : Equinox new nose cone

Got some sneak peak of the buck for the new equinox Nosecone

You asked and Dave has created it.

Took these today :






UPDATED PICTURE see others later in thread


Plus a picture of the bodywork fitted to a customers car (old nose cone)




Dave hopes that people will like the new nose and welcomes feedback.

Last edited by Ben_Copeland : 18th September 2012 at 09:48 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 17th September 2012, 08:19 PM
robo robo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: scabs
Posts: 1,722
Default

You have to be impressed with the way dave responded to that nosecone request. When you think we have been waiting years to see the vindaloo body products. Anyway you asked for a critical eye to be cast over it and here it is,in my opinion which is humble and worthless i think the whole thing is brilliant till it gets down to the oil cooler aperture. I think it needs more of a radius on the two bottom corners and slightly reducing the width of the cooler hole and again more of a radius in the aperture to stop it looking letter box like.

Bob
__________________
When The Results Disagree With The Theory: Believe The Results And Invent A New Theory
If I had two brains I,d still be a halfwit

The cave http://s1116.photobucket.com/user/my...deshow/mancave

The build http://www.haynes.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?t=12669

Last edited by robo : 17th September 2012 at 10:44 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 17th September 2012, 08:31 PM
ayjay ayjay is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Coedpoeth near Wrexham, North Wales
Posts: 737
Default

I think it looks good -a vast improvement.
However I think the opportunity may have been missed to design something a bit different eg flowing the two shapes into each other
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 17th September 2012, 08:47 PM
Ben_Copeland's Avatar
Ben_Copeland Ben_Copeland is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 290
Default

Ok so if it flowed into eachother and the radius at the bottom corners changed it would be spot on
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 17th September 2012, 08:54 PM
DRCorsa DRCorsa is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 95
Default

It looks nice but it would be better if the sides were wider and covering more the wishbones when you look at it at the front.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 17th September 2012, 08:55 PM
robo robo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: scabs
Posts: 1,722
Default

yep Carefull how you tell him cos you might end up wearing it for a hat.

Bob
__________________
When The Results Disagree With The Theory: Believe The Results And Invent A New Theory
If I had two brains I,d still be a halfwit

The cave http://s1116.photobucket.com/user/my...deshow/mancave

The build http://www.haynes.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?t=12669

Last edited by robo : 17th September 2012 at 08:59 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 17th September 2012, 09:12 PM
Ben_Copeland's Avatar
Ben_Copeland Ben_Copeland is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 290
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DRCorsa View Post
It looks nice but it would be better if the sides were wider and covering more the wishbones when you look at it at the front.
It's not a very good picture tbh. They do cover the wishbone mounts well. The picture makes it look narrower than it is.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 17th September 2012, 09:16 PM
Ben_Copeland's Avatar
Ben_Copeland Ben_Copeland is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 290
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by robo View Post
yep Carefull how you tell him cos you might end up wearing it for a hat.

Bob
I think helpful criticism is likely to result in a product that everyone wants.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 17th September 2012, 10:43 PM
robo robo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: scabs
Posts: 1,722
Default

It might also pay for the aperture to be set back a bit more as well because when the blank is cut out there wont be enough of a lip to clean up the edge and fit an edging strip. just thoughts.

bob
__________________
When The Results Disagree With The Theory: Believe The Results And Invent A New Theory
If I had two brains I,d still be a halfwit

The cave http://s1116.photobucket.com/user/my...deshow/mancave

The build http://www.haynes.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?t=12669
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 17th September 2012, 11:22 PM
Davidbolam Davidbolam is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Gosforth, Newcastle Upon Tyne
Posts: 856
Default

Looks good. I like the way the rear arches on the customers car fits the wheels nicely.

whos car is it?
__________________
Click to see my build photos on Flikr

http://www.flickr.com/photos/67112582@N03/

Saturn MX5 Based Chassis, Limited Slip Diff & 2.4 Quick Rack.

Build cost.... seems to be spending more on tools than car bits at the moment! (they will be handy in the future though).
Car iva'd and passed 15/08/2014. Finished weight 572kg.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:11 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.