Haynes Forums  

Go Back   Haynes Forums > Haynes Roadster Forums > Donor cars
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 20th September 2015, 08:06 AM
JasonL JasonL is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 66
Default

Hi Everyone.

I must be reading the IVA manual wrong. It seems to say pre-Aug 1986 was the CO<=4.5%, 1 Aug 1986 to 31 July 1992 CO<=3.5% and post 1 Aug 1992 CO<=0.2%/0.3%.

My Reg Certificate says my MX5 donor was first registered on 23/02/1995, which according to this post means I don't need a cat and CO<=4.5%, but from the IVA manual I need one and need to meet the 0.2/0.3%?!?

Am I being thick?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 20th September 2015, 09:05 AM
vmax1974's Avatar
vmax1974 vmax1974 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Teesside
Posts: 1,141
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JasonL View Post

Am I being thick?
erm..... well..... yes

Read it again its the difference between 1986 and 1995
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 20th September 2015, 10:14 AM
JasonL JasonL is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 66
Default

Erm... I see now. I should have had my coffee and read it again before posting.

According to the flow chart, they do a BET test first based on the tighter standards and if it fails then they go on to CAT1?!?

Anyway, thanks.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 20th September 2015, 10:56 AM
CTWV50's Avatar
CTWV50 CTWV50 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,297
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JasonL View Post
Erm... I see now. I should have had my coffee and read it again before posting.

According to the flow chart, they do a BET test first based on the tighter standards and if it fails then they go on to CAT1?!?

Anyway, thanks.
Don't worry, even the testers get confused! As mine did! They always seem to run the BET test even though the car doesn't qualify for it, I think it's so they can say "well you passed the BET test so the car now has to pass the BET test in future!" Or something, I don't know and I don't think they do either!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 20th September 2015, 12:57 PM
JasonL JasonL is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 66
Default

Thanks. That makes me feel slightly less stupid! 😎
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 20th September 2015, 04:07 PM
vmax1974's Avatar
vmax1974 vmax1974 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Teesside
Posts: 1,141
Default

Just re read my comment glad you never took offence to my tongue in cheek comment
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 20th September 2015, 04:18 PM
JasonL JasonL is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 66
Default

Nah, I'm thick in the skin as well as the head!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:02 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.