![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
A quick read up on Burton Power website suggests that the 'duratec' I thought was fitted to Fiestas etc is infact a Zetec SE.
Also I considered the Mazda rotary, but I think cost will rule that one out. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
don,t know if its worth considering but i used to have a Fiesta with the 1.25 zetec engine & that was one nippy little car, very good on fuel too, tho if fitting to a Roadster then you,d need the cat too, but it was a nice little revvy engine, cheap on fuel & insurance, hmmm
, in a very light weight "7" it might be reasonably quick enough andy tho its not rear wheel drive but maybe something can be done to facilitate it, was just trying to express what a good engine it is for its size/weight. Last edited by HandyAndy : 4th August 2009 at 10:57 AM. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
I have always been a fan of small, light cars with small capacity revvy engines. I currently run a Cinquecento Sporting. Old 1108cc engine, small light car, rev the nuts off it and it can emabrase most of the big German cars that think they can cut me up at roundabouts
Which is why I am not too bothered about a huge engine, I know what a small engine is capable of. So if the smaller Zetec engines are all part of the same family then I can seriously think about using one, if the weight reduction is noticeable. If there is only a kg or two in it then I may as well stick with a larger Zetec. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
you want a new duratec 2.0 they are ally block and head where as the zetec is a cast iron block and ali head.
the most import question here is how much do you have/want to spend as it can somewhat limit what you aim to achieve. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Budget is yet 'undecided'
but honestly, it will be as little as possible. I will be making almost everything from scratch, partly as I want to, partly to save as much initial outlay as possible.And I was kind of hoping a 1.6 (or similar) would weigh less, be less desireable, therefore.... cheaper |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Some research gives me these figures to think about....
Zetec SE 1600, 100bhp, 81kg (aparantly sometimes called the Duratec 1600) Zetec 1800, 105 to 130bhp, 115kg Zetec 2000, 135 to 145bhp, 115kg Duratec 2000, 145bhp, 97kg. So, the 1600 saves 34kg over the Zetec, but loses anywhwere between 5 and 45bhp in stock trim. But the Duratec seems to hold all the aces, its powerful and light. But I would guess the premium is its price. I'll start looking for whats about. Last edited by Balidey : 4th August 2009 at 12:06 PM. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Thanks Adrian, I got the above figures for the engines from there, but I didn't know the g/box info was on there too.
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|