Haynes Forums  

Go Back   Haynes Forums > Haynes Roadster Forums > Running gear
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 6th September 2009, 09:43 AM
TSM Locost's Avatar
TSM Locost TSM Locost is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Wisbech
Posts: 423
Default Confusion

Unless I am mistaken the picture ( p74 ) is opposite to the text on p73.

EDIT. Check the Drg on page 10, arms are made symetrical if not you would need 2 jigs as upper front needs. Brace should be under compression when acceleration. Pic must be wrong. OOOOOOOOOOOOOOP's
__________________
Be Lucky, Mike.

Last edited by TSM Locost : 6th September 2009 at 10:09 AM. Reason: confusion.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 6th September 2009, 10:52 AM
AshG's Avatar
AshG AshG is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Rochester
Posts: 1,882
Default

as tsm says the stress from forward motion should go into the brace at the front down to the rear sus bracket. the design is intended to make the wishbone stronger in forward motion should you hit pot holes curbs etc.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 6th September 2009, 02:00 PM
RAYLEE29's Avatar
RAYLEE29 RAYLEE29 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: POOLE DORSET
Posts: 520
Default

my 2p if i read the book amendments correctly bonzo has it correct it says:
"the lower wishbones need to be installed with the cross brace angled from outside rear to inside front"
So are you guys saying this is wrong or am i being thick?
Ray
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 6th September 2009, 06:31 PM
Hoybi's Avatar
Hoybi Hoybi is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Zonhoven, Belgium
Posts: 60
Default not really important

allow me to give my opinion on the matter.

The amendments state that the text (page 73) should be installed with the cross brace angled from outside rear to inside front. This corresponds with the picture on page 74.
But is contradictory to the drawing of page 10.

Either way, the brace is meant for the triangulation of the lower wishbone and it doesn't really matter how it is orientated.
However, it would look silly if you have the two mounted differently.
From the viewpoint of mechanics it would be logical to have the brace being stressed rather than compressed while taking loads (say driving). Mind you, I wouldn't like to sit in the car when the brace breaks, no matter how it was mounted.
__________________
Eddy
www.alfaprojects.be
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 6th September 2009, 08:49 PM
7ishNZ 7ishNZ is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Christchurch New Zealand
Posts: 67
Default

When the car is under power, the wheel is trying to pull the car forward, the brace would be under compression if it runs from outside rear to inside front. Seems to me that it doesn't really matter which way round it goes??
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 6th September 2009, 09:25 PM
Bonzo's Avatar
Bonzo Bonzo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Cornwall
Posts: 3,321
Talking Anyone for a X brace

This issue has confused the heck out of me

I may see if I can get the wishbone run through some Ansys software at some point.

Was it not Newton who said " For each action, there is an equal and opposite reaction "

Anyone for a X brace
__________________
I am not a complete idiot...........Some of the parts are missing !!
Ronnie

www.roadster-builders.co.uk
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 6th September 2009, 09:35 PM
RAYLEE29's Avatar
RAYLEE29 RAYLEE29 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: POOLE DORSET
Posts: 520
Default

I would have to say it depends on what creates the biggest force is it braking or acceleration? whichever one it is then that is the one that needs to place the crossbrace in compression.
this is only my opinion and im happy to be proven wrong with a valid explanation,
I still say that bonzo's pic ties up with the writing in the book amendments and is how mine are currently fitted.
Ray

Last edited by RAYLEE29 : 6th September 2009 at 09:39 PM. Reason: cant spell
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 6th September 2009, 09:35 PM
HandyAndy's Avatar
HandyAndy HandyAndy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: cleveland
Posts: 3,917
Default

and there,s me thinking i was the only that is confused

maybe Chris will be along soon to put us out of our confusion

andy
__________________
Flat Pack Chassis Kits for sale, contact me at andyroadster@yahoo.co.uk
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:51 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.