![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Sean
Didnt mean to confuse anyone. No second gearbox required, just use the engine and box from a fwd car turned through 90 degs. you then have one rive shaft pointing forwards and the other backwards. Connect these to the front & rear diffs, (which need to be 1:1 ratio). Just an idea. Chris |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
![]()
Actually quite a nice idea, not too sure where you would get the diffs though. I'm sticking with RWD, much more fun ![]()
__________________
Sean |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Dont quote me on this but I was once told that if you turn the engine sideways and drive two diff's the max revs you will get is about 1500 through the driveshafts,I cant remeber the reason why but the guy did build a 205 cozzy 4x4 featured in CCC in the 90's and he had tried it too and did not work well.
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() The easiest way to do this is to do what Z-cars still/used to do.
2 x ZX9 lumps facing each other one drives the front wheels the other the back ones. Job done. ![]() They also did it with an Ultima, that's on their website http://www.zcars.org.uk/ultima/index.htm Kind regards John
__________________
Quality parts for the Haynes Roadster - manufactured to a standard, not down to a price. Contact us at component-sales@hotmail.co.uk or visit our website www.3gecomponents.com
Last edited by 3GE Components : 7th November 2009 at 09:27 AM. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() I have spent a magic half hour in Spud 69 car this afternoon and I cannot see the need for a 4x4 unless you want huge amounts of power.
Just my opinion,if you aint tried it dont knock it. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Glad you enjoyed your blast around the lanes Paul, good innit???
![]() likewise... not wishing to knock anyones idea,s of engineering but the way the Roadster handles needs to be experienced to believe how good it really is, Spuds car has approx 330-340bhp per ton & is a great drive without being hard work to handle the power, i,m not sure where the benefit of 4x4 would be felt/needed. cheers andy |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() I can only agree with the above (another £50 thanks) and when your roadtser is complete you will see why.
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|