Haynes Forums  

Go Back   Haynes Forums > Haynes Roadster Forums > Chassis
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 21st August 2010, 10:30 AM
mr henderson mr henderson is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Aylesbury
Posts: 364
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nnrouty View Post

Im a Design Engineer by trade so should be able to work something out.
Well, there you go, no problem. Surprised you asked, quite honestly.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 21st August 2010, 12:32 PM
nnrouty nnrouty is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: West Cumbria, UK
Posts: 36
Default

I asked because i usualy deal with structural engineering.

Just not very clued up on suspension goenometry.
__________________
Building 1800 Zetec Roadster
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 21st August 2010, 12:55 PM
mr henderson mr henderson is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Aylesbury
Posts: 364
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nnrouty View Post

Just not very clued up on suspension goenometry.

And I made the comment because you've received advice that the consensus of which is that it is better to use Sierra uprights, and yet you seem happy to go ahead with the Cortina units, I formed the impression that you felt your engineering background trumped that advice, if I was mistaken, I apologise.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 21st August 2010, 01:10 PM
nnrouty nnrouty is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: West Cumbria, UK
Posts: 36
Default

Sorry not trying to cause arguments. I'm always willing to lean new things
__________________
Building 1800 Zetec Roadster
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 22nd August 2010, 01:35 PM
nnrouty nnrouty is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: West Cumbria, UK
Posts: 36
Default

Hi all

Last night i spent a few hours on AutoCAD and have finalised that you can use the cortina front upright providing you extend the upper front wishbones by 54mm and remove the 8'degree angle for the camber adjuster.

I have DWG drawings available that show zero bump steer using this setup.

No other changes needed.
__________________
Building 1800 Zetec Roadster
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 22nd August 2010, 03:17 PM
twinturbo's Avatar
twinturbo twinturbo is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Carlisle
Posts: 4,393
Default

So the steering arm is located in exactly the same place in relation to the lower pivot?

TT
__________________
You only get a woosh with a dump valve

Build Thread


Man Cave Mantiques



Cecil Street Auto Repairs Garage Carlisle




Build Cost £4181.65 - Last - Wheel Cylinders
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 22nd August 2010, 05:42 PM
nnrouty nnrouty is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: West Cumbria, UK
Posts: 36
Default

The relation between the track rod end and the maxi ball joint is not the same as the relation between the joint in the steering rack and the wishbone mount. But after drawing the suspension with the sock closed and partly closed there are no changes in distance from the track rod ends to the chassis.
__________________
Building 1800 Zetec Roadster

Last edited by nnrouty : 22nd August 2010 at 05:59 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:07 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.