![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() yes,
well thats how I,ve done mine, but its NOT the only way to achieve the desired result . there has been other builders using a different bearing carrier thru the bulkhead.... I think Ash G has some pics of how he did his in his build photos link. Just an after thought......which steering rack extensions are you using ? if its the ones detailed in the book, they are wrong( too long ) & makes the wheels point left & right at same time ![]() cheers andy Last edited by HandyAndy : 18th August 2011 at 02:28 PM. Reason: spelling...doh |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Oh great, I hope that's not part of my problem! I got them from saturn about 4-6 months ago? I'm not as worried about how it goes thru the bulkhead as that part seems to be ok. Slightly related though, is there an easy way to tell when the rack is 1/2 way between lock to lock (centered so to speak) as hopefully this will help tell if I've got it right?
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
![]() Depends on the rack you have 2.9 or 2.4 ( known as a quick rack ).....just turn the splined bit of the rack from lock to lock & count the number of turns required then go back half the number . But its easy to re center if using a group 4 coupling as you can just undo it & adjust it on the splines on the rack/group4 coupling in relation to centering your steering wheel to the rack center point. Hope it gets sorted for you. cheers andy Last edited by HandyAndy : 18th August 2011 at 02:39 PM. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Ok good to know the saturn ones will be right
![]() ![]() |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() The rack ratio is normally measured lock to lock 2.2 ,2.4,2.9 etc so at 3.5 it sounds like a standard rack.
Bob
__________________
When The Results Disagree With The Theory: Believe The Results And Invent A New Theory If I had two brains I,d still be a halfwit The cave http://s1116.photobucket.com/user/my...deshow/mancave The build http://www.haynes.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?t=12669 |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Fair enough, it was cheap at £50 so that's probly why. I forgot to take the pictures I took last night off my phone so I'll try and do that over the weekend so you all can see what I mean. I started cutting a new rack mount and checked my book vs the amendments in the announcements and the bend angle was different but the other measurements was the same. I think from memory the book had something like 130 degrees vs the 108 degrees in the revised one so I'm hoping this well help resolve the problem. I've also ordered a group 4 coupling and one of the splined shafts from rally design to hopefully get me round the upright/diagonal tube that's causing the problem.
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Right finally got round to sorting a photobucket account and got some pictures of this.
here's the original extension with the sierra->escort coupling that was fowling: ![]() ![]() So I got one of the splined shafts and group four couplings andy suggested and it fits much better than before although I still had to move the rack about 0.5cm to the right of the book position ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|