![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() It could be based on and around the the build sequence rather than the order its written in the iva that way you would avoid burying a mistake. If it was left in this section it would only need an occasional bump to remain on first page.
Just my 2pc Bob
__________________
When The Results Disagree With The Theory: Believe The Results And Invent A New Theory If I had two brains I,d still be a halfwit The cave http://s1116.photobucket.com/user/my...deshow/mancave The build http://www.haynes.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?t=12669 |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() it would be best to have points on where the std car is having problems to pass or fail points in design like the roll bar back stays only having one bolt (seatbelt issue)
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
![]() A classic example of testers personal opinion. Going to be up to the individual builder to make a choice. I will play it safe & alter my backstays .... One less thing it can fail from on the day ![]()
__________________
I am not a complete idiot...........Some of the parts are missing !! Ronnie ![]() www.roadster-builders.co.uk |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() personally i think an iva check list of known sticking points would be better.
__________________
My Roadster Is Finished NerNer....... Pigs can fly, you just have to carry them onto the plane. My Pictures http://s707.photobucket.com/user/ashgardiner/profile/ |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Just need a willing volunteer to write it up! |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|