Haynes Forums  

Go Back   Haynes Forums > Haynes Roadster Forums > Running gear
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 18th October 2011, 09:15 PM
baz-r baz-r is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,464
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by voucht View Post
Thank you all for your comments.
Baz-r, I like your idea of modifying the rear upper wishbone to get a lower attach point for the shock absorber. But isn't there the risk here too to bend the camber adjuster ? (As Phil said at the beginning of these thread that there is a risk of bending the front wishbone of I increase the move the front lower bracket inward).
as i pointed out it would need uprating (strengthaning) or another idea woud be to modify the plates where the shock meets the hub so the shock mount bolt is ferther inwards abit like a 7 shape extension to the rear hub just watch clearance with the top wishbone
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 18th October 2011, 09:50 PM
voucht's Avatar
voucht voucht is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Lautrec, Tarn (81), Occitanie, France
Posts: 879
Default

Thank you Baz-r. Yes, modifying the rear upright is another solution I thought about too. But all of this is quite complicated. Of only I could be sure about the clearance between the shock absorber and the wheel rim, I could either keep or reject the simple solution consisting of moving the upper bracket outward. But for this, I need the measurements I described in my previous post.
So, if somebody read that, thanks in advance !
Sylvain
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 19th October 2011, 07:55 AM
mopple mopple is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Estonia
Posts: 59
Default

voucht,
have you contacted Janne E? He got his car recently registered in Sweden. Here's some pictures of his car http://www.haynes.co.uk/forums/showp...2&postcount=62. Looks to me that his front shocks are per book design.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 19th October 2011, 10:18 AM
voucht's Avatar
voucht voucht is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Lautrec, Tarn (81), Occitanie, France
Posts: 879
Default

Hi Madis,
I watched the pictures of his car last week (and I think it is beautiful) but no, I didn't know he was in Sweden. And you are right, the suspension seems to be according to the book. I send him a personal email right now.
Thank you for the tip !
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 19th October 2011, 11:32 PM
ozzy1's Avatar
ozzy1 ozzy1 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: perth,australia
Posts: 760
Default

In regards to the front suspension what if you were to go for inboard suspension as they are more vertical and would solve the issue.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 20th October 2011, 07:00 AM
voucht's Avatar
voucht voucht is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Lautrec, Tarn (81), Occitanie, France
Posts: 879
Default

Hi Ozzy,
Thank you for your comment.
Yes, might be an idea, but in that case, I have to check if the angle of the push-rods will not be THE issue. I also have to check if I have enough clearance between the radiator fan and the engine.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 20th October 2011, 12:32 PM
Tilly819 Tilly819 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Leicestershire
Posts: 489
Default

you could do a rocking upper arm design, like this

http://www.google.co.uk/imgres?q=roc...1t:429,r:7,s:0

tilly
__________________
www.heraldic-motorsport.co.uk
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:45 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.