Haynes Forums  

Go Back   Haynes Forums > Haynes Roadster Forums > General discussion
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #4  
Old 28th November 2011, 03:29 AM
danilo danilo is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 30
Default

The A Arms in Caterhams and even Locusts don't feature an angled upper balljoint fittment .

Without doubt a different chassis design is suggested :-)
I ...have... drawn an SV clone chassis as a .dwg, down to the last detail.
And the geometry works fine :-) ALL of it.
Using Caterham SV overall dims. And Cat A arms.. why not? they are of good proven quality/design, as well as easily available for similar to clone pricings.
No inordinately long A Arms, No lay down coil overs. No boiler plate shock mounts.. in the wrong place :-) No hacksawing a steering rack :-)
I've solved the design for my chassis build to my complete satisfaction :-) Anyone else can do it too, it's no longer rocket science, with the plethora of excellent programs available these days.

Was only wondering aloud about the design, being so out of step with proven practice, is all and why seeming adults presumably with a fair amount of life experiences, are so complacent/ accepting of it.
Is it just because it's printed on a piece of paper ?
Reply With Quote
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:26 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.