Transmission tunnel type 9 or mt75?

[ozzy1]

I would think if you are likely to fit an mt75 in the future then build it to suit now.
Here is a link to the mt75 chassis drawings so you can compare the difference in size.

http://www.haynes.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?t=2430

[skov]

Welcome to the forum!

The only downside of the MT75 version I can think of is that you lose a bit of width from the (already cramped!) footwells.

[Shorty]

Good info, thanks.
Will have to consider those points before I order steel.
Skov- I see you are using mx5 engine/gearbox with slight mod to rear end from book spec, good to know that there are other options available without needing huge amounts of adjustment.
Is there any other engine/gearbox options that would fit into the basic chassis without serious alteration?

[Shorty]

Think I will just stick with zetec/type 9 as this seems very popular option.
Is there anything that needs altering to the chassis to fit this engine?
I read somewhere that one of the rails needs moving slightly to clear water pump... cant seem to find that post.
Just want to make sure I have a list of any amendments that will be needed from book spec before I start on the chassis

[baz-r]

the tr tube at the back of the engine needs to be steped back by 25-30mm in the middleabove the bell housing to get the std thermostat housing in at the back of the cyl head.
a simple way of doing this is to make the chassis as book then at the bit before you cut the bit out of the bottom rail for the bell housing tack (20mm welds) at the ends a section of 25mm box behind the top rail between the frontof the trans tunnel 19mm tubes then cut out the middle of the orignal with 45 deg cuts so the orignal is stepped back
i added 3mm packers in mine to get 28mm offset as it looked like i needed a bit more but 25mm would have been ok.
i hope you can get your head around my discription