Haynes Forums  

Go Back   Haynes Forums > Haynes Roadster Forums > Announcements
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 29th March 2012, 06:51 PM
CTWV50's Avatar
CTWV50 CTWV50 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,297
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sven8t4 View Post
Hey Just a quick note I used to play with 850 T5's and my V70AWDr these original rubber mounts fail all the time on the T5's the poly bush variants are much much better.

Steve
Cool! LOL!
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 29th March 2012, 07:24 PM
Big Vern Big Vern is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Milton Keynes
Posts: 320
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CTWV50 View Post
Hmm, thanks for the costructive critisism, I'm only running a cheap 1.6 open diff atm so if it does fail with this design I'll upgrade to a torsen and rethink the design. I think most people will of thought about a solid mounting to the chassis but surely you would end up with alot of vibration through the chassis which would cause other reliability issues.

edit: Have you got any links BV for the failures on locostusa? What's your source for the westield miata issues?

Cheers

Chris
I have long suspected the westfield miata suffers chassis cracking because of solidly mounting the diff, but the sierra diff is solidly mounted and does not throw up any problems.
As said already your design shows you have been thinking about how to mount the mazda diff and the unusual problems its design has created.
Heavy duty engine mounts perhaps rally spec would get the job done.

I came across the problems with westfield miata when I strumbled across the build thread for the car flyin' miata built.
The others including the locostusa came yesterday when I did a google search for MX5 miata diff mount problems.

Sorry I didn't do any links to these sites I was just havin' a beer and surfin'

Well done TQ uk - I like the gold brace on your RX8/Current MX5 rear end. That would be a good way of dealing with the problem, maybe just use the rear 6-8inches of the power plant frame or a lazer cut and folded substitute. That brace would constrain the diff nose and assist the two mounts in the diff carrier.

BV
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 30th March 2012, 12:10 AM
jenks's Avatar
jenks jenks is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Adelaide, Aus
Posts: 10
Default

I think Big Vern and CTWV50 pretty much have it sussed... Mr Gibbs designed the framework of the seat back to soak up the torsional loads of the diff, so that's where we need to send them in this design too. If we can do that and get some vibration isolation (poly bushes) then it's win-win, jelly and icecream for everyone!

Does anybody have a 3d cad file of the Saturn chassis with a model of the diff in place? (SolidWorks, Inventor or the like)

I'm thinking of something along the lines of a bracket mounted at 90 degrees to the right-hand seatback upright then a mount along the lines of Skov's diff nose mount but with 2 polly mounts fixed a 90 degrees, spaced a good distance apart to spread the loads acting under tension and compression...

Skov's design looks really nicely engineered but the mounts will be under shear forces when they're designed for compression (and I think they're rubber)

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-rANr4WQ7IX...unt_fitted.jpg

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-MVpVJo0hIs...t_fitted_2.jpg
__________________
210hp Toyota Beams, 6 spd, MX5 Rolling gear, LSD, Saturn wishbones and diff carrier
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 31st March 2012, 07:48 PM
Johno's Avatar
Johno Johno is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Lutton (East Anglia)
Posts: 497
Default

Well had a play about with the diff mounting today and managed to fit a welded frame to the nose of the diff and two rubber mounts.



Bit of a tight fit but it all goes in....just.....
Also fitted the spreader plate to one side of my diff bolted to my chassis bracket.



Obviously the spreader plate is in line with the bush and the spreader is at an angle to the diff housing. Does anybody know if this is the case on the MX5 or is the chassis mounting at an angle to run in line with the diff housing.

Johno
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 3rd April 2012, 08:35 PM
Johno's Avatar
Johno Johno is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Lutton (East Anglia)
Posts: 497
Default

Well I guess it's pretty much covered by BV and Jenks.
I guess the difference between the Sierra diff and MX5 is the Sierra doesn't have arms sticking out both sides making any torque movement worse. Sodily mounting the front nose of the diff will only cause metal fatigue and fracture of the chassis sometime in the future. Mazda realised this and fitted a PPF as standard. Triangulation of the chassis will only make things worse resulting in a weld faiure along the HAZ of a weld.
I spoke to Nathan Sunday and the only reason the diff broke was because he forgot to fit the diff washers....LOL..
Ok he agrees the diff mounting below the diff wasn't upto the job but this didn't brake.
Basically if the front nose of the diff was to be solidy mounted as per Westfieid and others who grow onions then Mazda could have saved a lot of RD money.
Well just my thoughts I guess others will disagree........
But I look at it this way, if Mazda fitted it it's good enough for me...

Johno
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 3rd April 2012, 11:11 PM
MarkB MarkB is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: naughty step most of the time
Posts: 494
Default

You do realise that IVA inspectors monitor forums like this
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 3rd April 2012, 11:23 PM
CTWV50's Avatar
CTWV50 CTWV50 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,297
Default

MarkB please get a life!
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 4th April 2012, 08:05 AM
MarkB MarkB is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: naughty step most of the time
Posts: 494
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CTWV50 View Post
MarkB please get a life!
Ti's true, I'm wasting my time but then I call it irratainment as it makes me chuckle the things people do and how they do them. Sometimes I comment sometimes I just laugh.
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 4th April 2012, 08:53 AM
CTWV50's Avatar
CTWV50 CTWV50 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,297
Default

What you're doing on this forum is nothing new to most people, it's quite clear you enjoy trolling this forum for your own reasons. I guess the best thing people can do is just ignore your posts as they really serve no useful purpose.

You may enjoy this little youtube video.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HaMOcJfsksI

For anyone who doesn't know what Mr. MarkB and his aliases is up to....

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Troll_(Internet)

Last edited by CTWV50 : 4th April 2012 at 08:57 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 4th April 2012, 09:34 AM
MarkB MarkB is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: naughty step most of the time
Posts: 494
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CTWV50 View Post
What you're doing on this forum is nothing new to most people, it's quite clear you enjoy trolling this forum for your own reasons. I guess the best thing people can do is just ignore your posts as they really serve no useful purpose.

You may enjoy this little youtube video.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HaMOcJfsksI

For anyone who doesn't know what Mr. MarkB and his aliases is up to....

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Troll_(Internet)
Indeed I'm best ignored, I never listen to anything I say as it's 99% tripe
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:28 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.