Haynes Forums  

Go Back   Haynes Forums > Haynes Roadster Forums > Engine/transmission
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 7th May 2013, 08:30 PM
flyerncle flyerncle is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: gateshead,near cobbly bit of A1 North
Posts: 3,188
Default

Make some new ones it will pay dividends in the end as I think you will find the engine rocking about in the engine bay and the mounts are a potential failure point.
__________________
Cost : Little as possible.
Thanks : To those who by their generosity my build has progressed.
Its a handmade sports car not a flaming kit car !!!


If at first you dont succeed,avoid skydiving...

No parachute require to freefall,only if you want to do it twice.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 7th May 2013, 08:40 PM
voucht's Avatar
voucht voucht is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Lautrec, Tarn (81), Occitanie, France
Posts: 879
Default

Thank you guys for the replies.

I totally understand your points, and you are right. I had the pre-feeling something was not completely right when I did them, and again, a post on this forum is putting me back on the right track

I will definitely try to make new ones. It will have the other advantage for me to accurately chose the height and get rid of these small 15mm steel extensions cylinders I built and I'm not found of either.

Keep you posted.

Thanks again.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10th May 2013, 06:10 PM
voucht's Avatar
voucht voucht is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Lautrec, Tarn (81), Occitanie, France
Posts: 879
Default

Rather than buying 30x30 box section tube, and removing my "book" engine boxes, I have tried to "copy" the cast aluminium engine mount wit 25x25 tubes. I could adjust their vertical position on the 5mm plate attached to the engine in order to get rid of the 15mm extension cylinder I did in the first place. I will cap the end of the tubes to close them.

CustomEngineMounts01.jpg

It fits perfectly, I have the right height and the clearance I needed between the steering column and the water outlet. For now, the elements are just tacked together, and before fully welding them I wanted your opinion. Will it be strong enough?

CustomEngineMounts02.jpg

I will also add 2 plated, on top and on the bottom, to "close" and brace the triangle. The bolt is just here to hold them together, and will be removed after I weld the plates. It will be a water drain as I don't want any water to be stuck in between the two plates.

CustomEngineMounts03.jpg

Please tell me what you think, is it OK, shall I fully weld and put the plates on top. If you confirm it is OK, I'll do the right mount in the same way.

Thank you very much in advance.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10th May 2013, 08:36 PM
jps jps is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Colchester, Essex
Posts: 439
Default

I'd think that bottom plate is too thin, I'll be doing mine out of 6mm plate...
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10th May 2013, 09:01 PM
K4KEV's Avatar
K4KEV K4KEV is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: WINGATE CO DURHAM
Posts: 1,511
Default

btm plate DEFO too thin......agree a minimum of 6mm plate
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10th May 2013, 10:10 PM
jps jps is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Colchester, Essex
Posts: 439
Default

I'm also going to use some 40mm box section which is 4mm wall I think. not sure if your box section is thick enough, also it's not welded all round, can you not construct it in such a way that you weld around the whole end of the box section rather than just one side?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11th May 2013, 02:27 PM
voucht's Avatar
voucht voucht is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Lautrec, Tarn (81), Occitanie, France
Posts: 879
Default

Thank you for the replies.
I changed the bottom plate to a 6mm (actually 5.5mm!) plat.I also made it longer, and it looks stronger now. Thanks for the tip.

IMG_5488.JPG
IMG_5489.JPG

I also cut another top plate which will cover the full length of the mount. I think it makes more sense.

IMG_5494.JPG
IMG_5495.JPG

JPS, I totally understand you last point, that makes sense. This was my first idea too, but while drawing, I discover that it would give a "pointy head" to the triangle, and the contact surface with the bottom plate would be to small. But now, with this longer and thicker bottom plate, it would be definitely a better option. But honestly, if you guys think that this version is OK and will be string enough, I'll leave it like that. Just let me know!

Thank you for your inputs.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:50 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.