Haynes Forums  

Go Back   Haynes Forums > Haynes Roadster Forums > Announcements
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 28th May 2013, 08:54 PM
Davidbolam Davidbolam is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Gosforth, Newcastle Upon Tyne
Posts: 856
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Johno View Post
Hi David,
Would like to help in the exhaust dept but rear wings not fitted yet...
Do you know which kit you are going for yet?
Most likely the agm one. I am going to try my hand at making a Grp wind deflector similar to the Saturn one. It seemed to be very effective up to about 80mph

Still a bit worried about the bonnet not fitting? May use a scoop to hide and necessary hole!

David
__________________
Click to see my build photos on Flikr

http://www.flickr.com/photos/67112582@N03/

Saturn MX5 Based Chassis, Limited Slip Diff & 2.4 Quick Rack.

Build cost.... seems to be spending more on tools than car bits at the moment! (they will be handy in the future though).
Car iva'd and passed 15/08/2014. Finished weight 572kg.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 1st June 2013, 12:43 PM
Johno's Avatar
Johno Johno is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Lutton (East Anglia)
Posts: 497
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Davidbolam View Post
Most likely the agm one. I am going to try my hand at making a Grp wind deflector similar to the Saturn one. It seemed to be very effective up to about 80mph

Still a bit worried about the bonnet not fitting? May use a scoop to hide and necessary hole!

David
Hi David,
Have you had a look at Aerodynamix products. http://www.aerodynamix.co.uk/grp-and...roscreens.html

Looks like some good products on there....

On my car the bonnet only just touches the front leading edge of the cam cover. So now I have my scoop will be cutting a hole in the bonnet soon to clear the engine which should be pretty straight forward.... I hope...
__________________
Any intelligent fool can make things bigger and more complex... It takes a touch of genius - and a lot of courage to move in the opposite direction.
Albert Einstein

http://s1199.photobucket.com/albums/aa472/JohnoSS1/

Johno
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 7th June 2013, 07:48 PM
Johno's Avatar
Johno Johno is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Lutton (East Anglia)
Posts: 497
Default

I've been thinking about making new rear top wishbones as I'm still not happy with the ones I currently have...

I've came up with two options..

Option 1.

Inboard Rose Joints with the shock mount inline with the upright, which I think would put less load on the Rose joints.




Option 2.

Rose joints outboard mounted directly to the top of the upright with inboard poly bushes. The shock mount will not be inline with the upright as option 1.The Rose joints will be 12mm reduced down to 10mm to suit MX5 upright. I'm guessing this will put a lot more load on the joints but will it be too much or Ok?



I'm using the Ultra strength 12mmx1.25 fine thread joints from McGill Motorsports.

Any input good or bad will be most helpful.
__________________
Any intelligent fool can make things bigger and more complex... It takes a touch of genius - and a lot of courage to move in the opposite direction.
Albert Einstein

http://s1199.photobucket.com/albums/aa472/JohnoSS1/

Johno
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10th June 2013, 09:24 PM
Johno's Avatar
Johno Johno is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Lutton (East Anglia)
Posts: 497
Default

Well I've been researching a bit on the net and think I'll be going with option 1.
This should keep the loading on the Rose joints to a minimum.
I guess only time and miles will tell...
__________________
Any intelligent fool can make things bigger and more complex... It takes a touch of genius - and a lot of courage to move in the opposite direction.
Albert Einstein

http://s1199.photobucket.com/albums/aa472/JohnoSS1/

Johno
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11th June 2013, 09:06 AM
Davidbolam Davidbolam is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Gosforth, Newcastle Upon Tyne
Posts: 856
Default hazard switch

Johno,

when you wired in the hazard switch did you find it only had 2 wires for the switch and 2 for ilumination.

I was planning on using the original mx5 switch and somehow removing the pop up headlight button that is on the same unit. When my mate came around last night he decided to look inside and now i have massive pile of various springs and connectors!!

i am now going to wire in a new switch but all the switches i've seen seem to have about 7 terminals

If you know the colours that would be fantastic (although judging by my loom they could easily be a different colour)

David
__________________
Click to see my build photos on Flikr

http://www.flickr.com/photos/67112582@N03/

Saturn MX5 Based Chassis, Limited Slip Diff & 2.4 Quick Rack.

Build cost.... seems to be spending more on tools than car bits at the moment! (they will be handy in the future though).
Car iva'd and passed 15/08/2014. Finished weight 572kg.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11th June 2013, 06:30 PM
Johno's Avatar
Johno Johno is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Lutton (East Anglia)
Posts: 497
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Davidbolam View Post
Johno,

when you wired in the hazard switch did you find it only had 2 wires for the switch and 2 for ilumination.

I was planning on using the original mx5 switch and somehow removing the pop up headlight button that is on the same unit. When my mate came around last night he decided to look inside and now i have massive pile of various springs and connectors!!

i am now going to wire in a new switch but all the switches i've seen seem to have about 7 terminals

If you know the colours that would be fantastic (although judging by my loom they could easily be a different colour)

David
Hi David,
If I remember correctly there should be an orange wire from the relay which is earthed through the switch... Hope that helps.
__________________
Any intelligent fool can make things bigger and more complex... It takes a touch of genius - and a lot of courage to move in the opposite direction.
Albert Einstein

http://s1199.photobucket.com/albums/aa472/JohnoSS1/

Johno
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11th June 2013, 07:00 PM
Davidbolam Davidbolam is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Gosforth, Newcastle Upon Tyne
Posts: 856
Default

Yes that makes sense.

Thanks

David
__________________
Click to see my build photos on Flikr

http://www.flickr.com/photos/67112582@N03/

Saturn MX5 Based Chassis, Limited Slip Diff & 2.4 Quick Rack.

Build cost.... seems to be spending more on tools than car bits at the moment! (they will be handy in the future though).
Car iva'd and passed 15/08/2014. Finished weight 572kg.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 13th June 2013, 06:43 PM
PorkChop PorkChop is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 394
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Johno View Post
Well I've been researching a bit on the net and think I'll be going with option 1.
This should keep the loading on the Rose joints to a minimum.
I guess only time and miles will tell...
Option 1 would be more preferable to option 2. The rod ends would have more bending force acting on them (from acceleration/deceleration) if they were outboard.

One of the best ways though, would be to have an alignment bolt system, like Mazda fitted as OE to the MX-5.

Last edited by PorkChop : 13th June 2013 at 08:47 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 13th June 2013, 06:47 PM
skov's Avatar
skov skov is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,085
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PorkChop View Post
One of the best ways though, would be to have an alignment bolt system, like Mazda fitted as OE to the MX-5.
Don't give him any more ideas, he'll never get them finished
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 13th June 2013, 08:06 PM
jason 82 jason 82 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Coleford
Posts: 354
Lightbulb

Johno,
Why don't you design an in-board suspension system, where the shockers are hidden away in the bodywork ? I know space is limited, but by Christ, you would have some thing that looks really sweet. The only haynes with in board suspension. I would love to do it, but I have not got the expertise to see the plan through. Another idea I have, is to run the brake lines and wiring inside the wishbones. They are hollow, so why not ? Of course you have to think about strength, but you can't build a kick ass car without taking a few brave decisions. I am doing the wishbone idea myself.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:02 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.