![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() the way you have it now will give maximum strength for the direction of travel ie forwards
![]() |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() It's in the amendments, the text on page 73 is wrong:
Quote:
__________________
Albert Haynes Roadster FAQ | Haynes Builder Locations Gallery, build thread in Lithuanian / via Google Translate. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Thanks for the help, I'll have a rolling chassis tomorrow
![]() ![]() What has happened to the forum btw? Where have all the posts from the other sub-forums gone? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() If you mean the other forum sections, you have sign into them.
The password is Haynes |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() i would say you want the outside front point to have the v end so under drive as its under compression where as the rear single tube is under tension (strongest for drive).
also if you crashed it would deform the wishbone under impact easyer not the chassis im going to go have a look now to see what way i put mine round? Last edited by baz-r : 30th July 2013 at 05:18 PM. Reason: typo |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|