Haynes Forums  

Go Back   Haynes Forums > Haynes Roadster Forums > Engine/transmission
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 28th September 2013, 07:14 AM
voucht's Avatar
voucht voucht is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Lautrec, Tarn (81), Occitanie, France
Posts: 879
Default Bike exhaust

Hi,
I'm about to get, for free, a motorbike rear muffler for my Roadster. It is from a BMW K1300R. My best friend in France will give it to me, I just have to pay for the shipment.


PotBMW par Voucht71, sur Flickr

This rear muffler has an integrated catalyst (and I need one on my car to pass the emission test), which is pretty cool because I won't have to fit an ugly cat on the line (or the better looking but very expensive stainless steel conical cat).

The engine of this motorbike, when unleashed, is more powerful than my 115 hp 2.0i DOHC from the Sierra, so it should cope with it with no problem.


But by safety, before having it sent to me, I'd like to have your opinion. Do you see any reason why it could not work on my car?


Thanks a lot.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 30th September 2013, 02:02 PM
MikeB MikeB is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Nr Wellingborough
Posts: 512
Default

Seem to remember when I looked, standard bike cans were quite restrictive, but other than that should work.
__________________
Build Cost so far £xxx (Given up adding it up) - She Starts!! Build Thread Here:
http://www.haynes.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?t=5501
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 30th September 2013, 02:17 PM
voucht's Avatar
voucht voucht is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Lautrec, Tarn (81), Occitanie, France
Posts: 879
Default

Thank you for the comment Mike.

Yes, it has been my concern too, but I'm quite confident with this can as
- it has a 75mm diameter inlet (much larger than my main line)
- I checked the performance graphs of after market sports cans (like Devil, etc.) for the same bike, and the gain of performance is peanuts if you compare to the original can. So I guess the original can is not too bad.

But of course, I can't be sure before trying it on the road

Thanks for the input.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 30th September 2013, 08:14 PM
Johno's Avatar
Johno Johno is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Lutton (East Anglia)
Posts: 497
Default

I spent a while looking around the Locost forum before I chose my R1 can.
The general consensus was if the BHP of the bike was more than the engine you are fitting in your car it should be fine.
Well I hope that's true as it's fitted now...
She certainly looks a beastie of a can, can't see why it wouldn't be ok..
__________________
Any intelligent fool can make things bigger and more complex... It takes a touch of genius - and a lot of courage to move in the opposite direction.
Albert Einstein

http://s1199.photobucket.com/albums/aa472/JohnoSS1/

Johno
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 6th October 2013, 12:57 PM
voucht's Avatar
voucht voucht is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Lautrec, Tarn (81), Occitanie, France
Posts: 879
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Johno View Post
I spent a while looking around the Locost forum before I chose my R1 can.
The general consensus was if the BHP of the bike was more than the engine you are fitting in your car it should be fine.
Well I hope that's true as it's fitted now...
She certainly looks a beastie of a can, can't see why it wouldn't be ok..
Thank you for the input Johno.

I think I know what you mean by "beastie"... yes, I was concerned by the look of it too... not very "sevenesque"... I know...

Well, assuming that my Roadster will not have a "retro look", why not? We'll see how it looks when it is fitted!

It should be with me hopefully any time next week.

Thanks!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 27th October 2013, 09:02 PM
voucht's Avatar
voucht voucht is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Lautrec, Tarn (81), Occitanie, France
Posts: 879
Default

I received the rear muffler from the BMW K1300R on Saturday.


2013-10-26_11-16-37 par Voucht71, sur Flickr

Now I have to find a way to fit it. Originally, there is one fitting point on a clamp, and, on the bike, it is "hanging" from this upper mounting point.


2013-10-26_11-17-18 par Voucht71, sur Flickr
(on this picture, I'm holding the muffler by its original upper mounting point)

On the Roadster, as my exhaust line is on the left side, I need to turn it up side down. And the muffler not being symmetrical on the longitudinal axis (its left shape is not the same as its right shape) I just can't turn the clamp around (unless I completely straighten it flat, and shape it again perfectly to get it flush with every face/edge of the muffler section's shape). So if I turn the muffler up side down, and keep the clap as it is, the mounting point will be is under the muffler.


2013-10-26_11-17-34 par Voucht71, sur Flickr
(on this picture, the mounting point is in my fingers)

How do you guys think I should mount it? I will of course use a rubber mount, but is a lower point OK ? It feels weird as the piece is almost 7 kg (integrated cat.).

Any idea, opinion, tip..; is very welcome

Thanks a lot.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 27th October 2013, 09:27 PM
K4KEV's Avatar
K4KEV K4KEV is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: WINGATE CO DURHAM
Posts: 1,511
Default

Hi Syl....I think I would be tempted to cut a wedge out of the inlet and bend it to accept a straight pipe from your exhaust but also put some kind of deflector at the very end to keep your rear arch clean, of course being stainless you will need tig or silver solder.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 1st November 2013, 05:34 AM
voucht's Avatar
voucht voucht is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Lautrec, Tarn (81), Occitanie, France
Posts: 879
Default

Thanks for that Kev. Yep, good tip about the deflector at the rear, I'll do that at the end, thanks.

When in comes to the inlet, I think I will remove the small elbow, and have the tube from the exhaust directly welded on it. I just have to figure out the different angles and have the stainless steel tube bent/weld by someone who has the facility to weld stainless steel (I don't and I won't).

So, the muffler will be mounted on a rubber mount from underneath (I'll use a small 90° bracket on the original clamp mounting point, the horizontal part of the bracket will seat on the top of a rubber mount, which will be bolted on a tab welded under the chassis). But do I need another "soft" point between my manifold and the muffler, or can the line be solid all the way? Does the pipe from the manifold to the muffler need to be supported too, or 1 mounting point on the muffler is enough?

Thanks.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 1st November 2013, 06:39 AM
K4KEV's Avatar
K4KEV K4KEV is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: WINGATE CO DURHAM
Posts: 1,511
Default

I would certainly go for two mounting places.....the other one I would put where ever it is the most convenient/easy to do.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 2nd November 2013, 05:42 AM
jason 82 jason 82 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Coleford
Posts: 354
Default

Do the cars pass the emissions with the cat built in on the motorbike exhaust then ? I have a 1996 mx5 donor, so my car would require a cat, but the systems suitable on a. 7 is basically a straight through, so I just wasn't sure if a bike can is used, how iva & mot friendly the bike cans are ? I know that they will definitely be louder, but will they fail the tests ?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:19 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.