Haynes Forums  

Go Back   Haynes Forums > Haynes Roadster Forums > Announcements
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #23  
Old 3rd April 2012, 08:35 PM
Johno's Avatar
Johno Johno is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Lutton (East Anglia)
Posts: 497
Default

Well I guess it's pretty much covered by BV and Jenks.
I guess the difference between the Sierra diff and MX5 is the Sierra doesn't have arms sticking out both sides making any torque movement worse. Sodily mounting the front nose of the diff will only cause metal fatigue and fracture of the chassis sometime in the future. Mazda realised this and fitted a PPF as standard. Triangulation of the chassis will only make things worse resulting in a weld faiure along the HAZ of a weld.
I spoke to Nathan Sunday and the only reason the diff broke was because he forgot to fit the diff washers....LOL..
Ok he agrees the diff mounting below the diff wasn't upto the job but this didn't brake.
Basically if the front nose of the diff was to be solidy mounted as per Westfieid and others who grow onions then Mazda could have saved a lot of RD money.
Well just my thoughts I guess others will disagree........
But I look at it this way, if Mazda fitted it it's good enough for me...

Johno
Reply With Quote
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:24 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.