Haynes Forums  

Go Back   Haynes Forums > Haynes Roadster Forums > Announcements
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #15  
Old 29th March 2012, 11:21 AM
MarkB MarkB is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: naughty step most of the time
Posts: 494
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jenks View Post
Sorry @MarkB , I don't see the logic in your posts at all... Are you saying this diff failure wouldn't have happened if the diff cage / chassis was further reinforced? Not trying to be offensive, I'm just not sure what you're trying to get at!

Can understand the need for more rigid mounting on the nose of diff but the overall cage / rear frame design and support of the diff wing has nothing to do with this failure. The tortional forces on the wing bushes are nothing compared to those on the nose mounts. Use the correct bush caps, mount the nose properly and diff won't dismember itself.

A more contructive input would be telling everybody where you think this additional triangulation needs to go (?)
The diff was able to move so it broke that is simple to understand. The diff needs to fixed so it can't move or at best severely restrict how much it can by using the correct rubber mountings. My choice would be solid mount the diff and triangulate the chassis.
It's obvious where the rear cradle is weak as it is open rectangles with no triangulation and the diff is fixed to this........less is more usually and take a good look at how Marc Norden has done the MNR, simple yet very effective.
Reply With Quote
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:10 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.